This Is What it Looks Like to Buy Stocks ‘When There’s Blood in the Streets’

This Is What it Looks Like to Buy Stocks ‘When There’s Blood in the Streets’

This Is What it Looks Like to Buy Stocks ‘When There’s Blood in the Streets’


Turn on the TV or scroll on social media, and you’ll find every self-proclaimed market sage, financial influencer, and Wall Street whisperer shouting their take on stocks into the void. 

The ‘experts’ have emerged from their bunkers. But it seems none of them can agree on what’s to come.

Some say to buy the dip. Others advise to stay far away. And many still warn: This is 2008 all over again.

So… which is it? Historic buying opportunity, or just the first leg of a much larger collapse?

We’ll venture to answer that – not with opinion and theory but with data.

And to us, the data is screaming one thing: If you’ve got time on your side, you should be buying stocks hand over fist right now

Though, of course, we’ll let you decide for yourself.

Here’s what we’re seeing…

A Fast-and-Furious Decline in Stocks

This recent market madness began when President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were announced on Wednesday, April 2. Investors didn’t take the plan lightly.

That Thursday, April 3, the S&P 500 dropped more than 5%. Then on Friday, it slid another 5%-plus.

That’s a 10% two-day crash – a move that’s not just rare but nearly unprecedented.

Since 1950, this kind of price action has occurred just five times:

  • Twice during Black Monday (1987)
  • Twice during the great financial crisis (2008–09)
  • Once during March 2020’s COVID Crash 

Now, here’s the important part: All five times, the S&P was higher one year later. The average 12-month return? 33%. Even with the worst-case outcome, stocks were up 18% by that time the next year.

But, of course, the selling didn’t stop in the two days after the “Liberation Day” tariffs were announced. 

This past Monday added more pain. The three-day total decline reached 11%, marking the 11th-largest three-day drop since 1950.

On Tuesday, April 8, we slid even further, bringing the four-day collapse to 12.1% – the 12th-worst four-day stretch in modern market history.

And guess what?

Every other time the market has fallen more than 10% in three days or more than 12% in four days, it was higher a year later.

And sometimes, stocks moved way higher. After similar four-day collapses, the market’s average return over the next 12 months is nearly 70%.

Then came the snapback rally.

Bullish Historical Signals

On Wednesday, April 9, President Trump announced a 90-day pause on all country-specific reciprocal tariffs (except China). It was the first signal that the administration might pivot from trade war escalation to negotiation.

And the market’s response was explosive. The S&P 500 surged 9.5%, marking one of the biggest one-day gains of all time.

Since 1950, the S&P has only rallied more than 5% in a single day 23 times. In 21 of those instances (91% of the time), the market was higher a year later, with an average return of 27%.

So far, that fits the pattern: Big selloff. Big rally. Big opportunity.

Now, we’ll admit; Thursday was rough. Stocks gave up a large portion of the 9%-plus gains they notched on Wednesday.

Indeed, the S&P dropped 3.5%, leading some to cry “dead cat bounce.”

But historically? Even that’s bullish.

Since 1950, every single time the S&P 500 rallied more than 5% in one day, and then dropped more than 2% the next day, the market was higher a year later, with average 12-month gains north of 37%.

In other words, even the rejection of a bounce has been a bullish historical signal.



Source link

Leave a Reply