Numerous conflicts plague today’s world, making economic sanctions a valuable tool for dealing with potential threats such as terrorism, illicit trade and human rights abuses. Complying with these sanctions poses many challenges for international companies. However, digital payments and blockchain innovations — such as stablecoins, the increasingly popular decentralized digital asset — have shown promise for navigating the potentially sticky landscape of sanctions compliance.
Sanctions are legal measures that governments impose against specific individuals, entities or countries to curb activities ranging from war and terrorism to money laundering and human rights violations. They are typically enacted by the United Nations, the European Union or the US.
Sanctions aren’t always as clear-cut as banning the sale of weapons to known terrorist organizations. They can apply to many types of transactions, like supply mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures or advisory services. Enforcing these policies is critical to international security. Companies must be careful to comply to avoid significant legal and financial consequences from engaging with an entity cited on any of the ever-changing watchlists.
Sanctions compliance is particularly important in the context of payments. Financial institutions and payment processors play a pivotal role in executing transactions, and it’s essential that these entities do not facilitate transfers to sanctioned parties.
Understanding sanctions compliance
Definition and importance of sanctions compliance
Sanctions compliance refers to the process of adhering to economic sanctions imposed by governments or international organizations on specific countries, entities or individuals. These sanctions restrict or prohibit certain activities, such as trade, investment or financial transactions, to achieve foreign policy or national security goals.
For businesses and financial institutions, avoiding the violation of these restrictions — sanctions compliance — is crucial. Noncompliance can result in significant fines, reputational damage and legal consequences, which demands that companies have robust compliance programs in place.
History and evolution of sanctions compliance
The concept of sanctions compliance has evolved significantly over time.
Britain and France imposed the first modern sanctions during World War I, in an effort to isolate Germany and its allies from the global economy. Since then, sanctions have become increasingly widespread, with the US, EU and other countries imposing their own sanctions regimes.
The rise of globalization and international trade has added layers of complexity to sanctions compliance. Companies must navigate a web of national and international regulations to avoid inadvertently violating sanctions. This evolution has made sanctions compliance a challenging but vital aspect of global business operations.
Key players in sanctions compliance
Sanctions compliance involves a range of key players, each with specific roles and responsibilities:
- Governments and international organizations: These entities impose and enforce sanctions, providing guidance on compliance requirements. They play a crucial role in shaping the regulatory landscape.
- Financial institutions: Banks, payment processors and other financial institutions are at the forefront of sanctions compliance. They are responsible for screening transactions and identifying potential sanctions risks, making their role vital in the compliance ecosystem.
- Businesses: Companies must ensure that their operations, including international trade, investment and financial transactions, comply with sanctions regulations. This requires a thorough understanding of the sanctions landscape and proactive risk management.
- Regulators: Regulatory bodies, such as the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), enforce sanctions compliance and issue fines for noncompliance. Their scrutiny ensures that institutions adhere to the regulatory obligations.
By understanding the roles of these key players, businesses and financial institutions can better navigate the complexities of sanctions compliance and avoid the severe consequences of noncompliance.
Types of sanctions
Sanctions can take several forms, each targeting a different aspect of the sanctioned party’s activities. The most common types include:
- Comprehensive sanctions: These are typically imposed on entire countries or governments. They restrict almost all forms of trade, finance and interaction with the sanctioned country.
- Sectoral sanctions: These target specific sectors of a country’s economy, such as finance, energy or defense. They might prohibit specific types of transactions or financial dealings with particular industries within a sanctioned country.
- List-based sanctions: These sanctions are imposed on individuals, entities or organizations that are identified on official lists. They often include asset freezes and prohibitions on business dealings.
- Embargoes: These are broad restrictions that can prohibit trade, investment and financial transactions with specific countries or regions.
- Secondary sanctions: These are penalties imposed on non-US entities for doing business with countries or entities that are already under US sanctions. These can be especially challenging for companies with global operations.
Understanding the different types of sanctions is critical to managing sanctions risk, especially when conducting cross-border payments or transactions with foreign entities.
The state of sanctions compliance
Sanctions compliance has become increasingly important and complex in recent years. Financial institutions, corporations and fintech companies must carefully navigate a maze of national and international regulations to ensure they don’t inadvertently violate sanctions laws.
The impact of these regulations on business operations and compliance activities cannot be overstated. The challenges of sanctions compliance are multifaceted, ranging from the sheer volume and global reach of sanctions to the sophistication of noncompliant actors who attempt to circumvent restrictions.
The complexity is compounded by the fast-evolving landscape of digital currencies and decentralized finance, including stablecoins, offering new rails for cross-border payments while raising questions about how they fit into existing regulatory frameworks.
Sanctions compliance challenges
Sanctions compliance has become increasingly complex due to several factors.
One of the primary challenges is the sheer number of global sanctions. To identify and prevent dealings with sanctioned entities before they happen, organizations must deploy such tactics as checking transactions, customers, counterparties and business partners against sanctions lists from:
- Office of Foreign Asset Control sanctions: The US Treasury’s OFAC sanctions list is one of the most widely followed. It includes hundreds of individuals, organizations and countries that are prohibited from engaging in business with US companies.
- European Union sanctions: The EU maintains its own sanctions lists. Tracking both sets of restrictions can be difficult for companies operating in multiple regions.
Keeping track of these lists is a daunting task, as they frequently change, with new names and countries added and others removed.
A secondary challenge is the complexity of sanctions regulations. As noted by KPMG, the regulatory landscape is constantly evolving, and navigating these rules requires businesses to be proactive. The compliance burden is especially heavy for financial institutions that must check a large number of transactions against multiple sanctions lists in real time.
Another major issue is the difficulty of conducting Know Your Customer (KYC) checks in a comprehensive and accurate manner — and applying those standards to other types of business relationships, such as suppliers, advisors, lenders or joint venture partners.
Identifying sanctioned entities or individuals can be challenging due to the constantly shifting nature of the global economy. Fraudsters and other bad actors are becoming more sophisticated in their attempts to bypass sanctions, often utilizing shell companies, fake identities and cryptocurrencies to obscure the true nature of transactions.
Penalties for doing business with a sanctioned entity can range from millions to billions of dollars, depending on the severity of the violation. A robust sanctions compliance program is essential to mitigate these risks.
The role of blockchain and stablecoins in sanctions compliance
The proliferation of fintech solutions in the cross-border payments industry can be a double-edged sword when it comes to sanctions compliance.
While funds can transfer through a digital blockchain to maintain transparency and vet potential bad actors, they can also be used to facilitate undetectable transactions.
What is a stablecoin?
Stablecoins enable seamless global transactions without traditional banking intermediaries. This cryptocurrency is pegged to hard currencies such as the US dollar or euro, giving it a more reliable value than other cryptocurrencies, which can fluctuate drastically.
Mainly, stablecoins are used to trade other crypto assets, but they play a vital role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem as their use cases expand internationally. For example, people in countries with weak currencies can seek a steady and transferable substitute to their local money, enabling global access to the financial services industry and promoting financial inclusion.
Stablecoins transforming the financial services industry
Even if the US does not take action to regulate the use of stablecoins or blockchain technology, stablecoins are likely to grow in popularity among cross-border companies because many other jurisdictions are creating frameworks to license them, including EU, the UK, Japan, Singapore and the UAE.
According to the Brookings Institute, upcoming regulations may require stablecoin issuers to maintain reserves, capital and liquidity levels; set reporting and disclosure standards; and ensure that holders’ claims take priority over issuer debt or other claims. Additionally, stablecoin issuers may be compelled to monitor blockchains for suspicious transactions and possibly freeze the digital currency if the transaction is flagged for noncompliance with sanctions.
One such set of regulations came from the European Parliament in 2023 when it approved the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) policy following the fall of FTX. MiCA is designed to ensure a level playing field for crypto investors, and it offers some guidance on how to prevent cross-border payments from being noncompliant with international sanctions.
Ensuring sanctions compliance amid the rise of stablecoins
The emergence of stablecoins has introduced new challenges for sanctions compliance. Stablecoins facilitate quick and often anonymous cross-border transactions, which can be used to evade sanctions. This creates significant risks for sanctions compliance, as stablecoins may be exploited to circumvent restrictions or engage in illicit activities. Consequently, regulators are increasingly scrutinizing stablecoins and their interaction with sanctions.
To ensure sanctions compliance in the context of stablecoins, businesses and financial institutions must adopt a proactive approach. This includes conducting regular risk assessments, implementing effective screening and monitoring systems and providing comprehensive training to employees on compliance requirements. Additionally, staying informed about evolving regulations and collaborating with regulators can help institutions manage the risks associated with this digital currency.
By taking these steps, businesses and financial institutions can protect themselves from the risks of sanctions noncompliance and create a competitive advantage in the global marketplace. Understanding and managing the challenges posed by stablecoins is essential for maintaining robust sanctions compliance in today’s digital age.
How can stablecoins help with sanctions compliance?
In addition to providing an efficient alternative to traditional remittance systems that can be costly and slow, stablecoins offer new ways to ensure compliance. Blockchain’s transparent and immutable nature allows for real-time tracking of transactions, making it easier to trace the flow of funds and identify potential violations.
Leveraging blockchain technology in sanctions compliance can provide an additional layer of oversight, helping companies spot suspicious transactions before they occur.
According to Brookings, regulatory bodies are closely monitoring the national security risks associated with these digital assets. The transparency and traceability of blockchain transactions, coupled with regulatory frameworks, can help combat illicit activity and ensure that stablecoins are not being used to bypass sanctions.
Regulatory technology to manage regulatory obligations
What is regtech?
Looking forward, regtech — the use of technology to enhance regulatory compliance — will be pivotal in managing sanctions risks.
Regtech tools are meant to help protect against risks including market abuse, cyber attacks and fraud. Financial institutions and regulators use them to deal with complicated compliance processes.
Regulatory technology reduces risk by offering data on money-laundering activities conducted online and by monitoring online transactions in real time to identify issues or irregularities.
Regtech tools can automate many of the tasks involved in sanctions compliance, including screening, regulatory monitoring and reporting. Using AI and machine learning, these tools can process a high volume of data at incredible speeds, enabling quick analysis and insights for compliance.
These technologies can also help organizations stay up-to-date with the latest regulations.
The future of sanctions compliance
Europe’s MiCA regulations are expected to bring greater clarity and structure to the regulation of cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins. According to Boston Consulting Group, MiCA aims to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, ensuring that companies operating in the crypto space adhere to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.
In addition to MiCA, governments worldwide are expected to continue strengthening their sanctions enforcement efforts. The use of digital assets and blockchain technology in payments will only increase, making it essential for businesses to stay ahead of the regulatory curve.
The US is particularly interesting as a new administration is settling in with a pro-crypto agenda and promises to toughen policies governing foreign trade.
The future of sanctions compliance will undoubtedly be shaped by advancements in regtech and the tightening of regulatory frameworks like MiCA, offering both challenges and opportunities for businesses in the digital age. By building a comprehensive and effective compliance program, businesses can protect themselves from the severe consequences of noncompliance while contributing to the broader goal of global security.
Want more insights on the topics shaping the future of cross-border payments? Tune in to Converge, with new episodes every Wednesday.
Plus, register for the Daily Market Update to get the latest currency news and FX analysis from our experts directly to your inbox.