Quantum Stocks Just Had Their Breakout Moment – This Is Only the Beginning


It’s not every day that a single announcement sends an entire group of stocks surging by double digits.

Editor’s Note: The market may be turbulent, but innovation never stops — and that’s exactly why InvestorPlace Senior Analyst Louis Navellier remains confident. 

Just days ago, a little-known quantum computing called D-Wave Quantum’s announced a breakthrough in the quantum computing space. As a result, quantum stocks surged, with some gaining double digits in a single day.

Now, quantum computing today is where AI was back in 2016. So, it is an exciting investment opportunity that you won’t want to miss out on.

But let’s be honest: Quantum computing is complex, and understanding its real impact on the market can be challenging. That’s why Louis Navellier held an urgent briefing this past Thursday just one week before Nvidia’s big “Quantum Day” announcements – which could be a game-changer for the industry.

Click here now to watch a replay of that event.

Today, Louis is joining us to share more about D-Wave’s breakthrough. Take it away…

First of all, I want to thank all of the folks who joined my Next 50X NVIDIA Call special summit on Thursday.

We covered a lot of ground, including…

  • NVIDIA Corporation’s (NVDA) upcoming Quantum Day (Q Day) event.
  • The revolutionary shift quantum computing will bring to AI.
  • The single stock I believe could deliver a 50X return – like NVIDIA did once the AI Revolution took off.

You can check out the replay of the Next 50X NVIDIA Call right here.

And as it turns out, our timing was perfect with this event.

Because while NVIDIA’s Q Day is still a week away, quantum computing stocks surged on Wednesday on some fresh news that I need to share with you…

Why Everyone Is Talking About Quantum Supremacy

It’s not every day that a single announcement sends an entire group of stocks surging by double digits.

But that’s exactly what happened on Wednesday when a little-known quantum computing company revealed a stunning breakthrough that shocked the market.

The company – D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) – released a statement saying that one of its quantum computers completed a complex materials-science simulation in just 20 minutes.

In fact, it was a task that would have taken Frontier, of today’s most powerful classical supercomputers, nearly a million years to finish.

What’s more, the company claims it is the first problem of real scientific importance to be solved with quantum computing. The results were published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

In other words, D-Wave has achieved what quantum researchers and folks in the industry call “quantum supremacy”… using the technology to do something useful that no classical supercomputer could do.

This is a big deal, folks. Because if you’ve been following along with our quantum computing coverage this week, you know that up until recently, this stuff was constrained to government labs and universities.

To briefly recap, quantum computing operates at the subatomic level, using cutting-edge technology like ultracold superconducting chips. Quantum computers perform calculations with quantum bits, or “qubits,” which encode information differently than classical computers. This gives quantum computers the potential to solve problems far too complex or time-consuming for even the best classical supercomputers.

In this case, D-Wave used an “annealing” quantum computer, which specializes in optimization problems. These types of quantum computers find the optimal or most efficient solution by rapidly exploring a massive number of possibilities simultaneously.

In its groundbreaking test, D-Wave partnered with an international team of scientists to simulate “spin glasses,” a type of complex magnetic material with critical business and scientific applications. The simulations were performed on both D-Wave’s Advantage2 prototype annealing quantum computer and on Frontier, a classical supercomputer at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The results were astonishing.

D-Wave’s quantum computer completed the hardest simulation in just minutes, delivering accurate data on complex lattice structures and magnetic behaviors. As I mentioned earlier, the same simulation would have taken nearly 1 million years on the Frontier supercomputer – and it would have required more electricity than the entire world consumes in one year.

The bottom line is that it seems like this was practical, tangible proof that quantum computing is nearly ready for real-world use.

As a result, on Wednesday, D-Wave’s shares popped 11% on the news…

Another popular quantum stock climbed 16%…

And my No. 1 quantum pick jumped 10%.

D-wave’s shares got another boost Thursday after reporting fourth-quarter and year-end results for 2024, rallying another 18%.

For the year, it reported an adjusted net loss of $75.6 million, or $0.39 per share. That’s a decrease of $7.3 million, or $0.21 per share from the previous year. Revenue was essentially flat year over year, but bookings were up 128% over the previous year ($23.9 million vs. 10.5 million).

Now, the key quantum computing players in this space are quite small. Most of them are trying to build up revenue, narrow their losses and achieve critical breakthroughs to commercialize quantum computing – all at the same time.

That’s a tough feat to pull off, but the upside is worth it. Because quantum computing has the potential to:

  • Help biopharma companies discover breakthrough drugs faster than ever before. 
  • Automakers develop driverless car systems that really work. 
  • Chemical companies to develop materials we can’t even imagine. 
  • And so much more.

Quantum Computing Continues to Advance

D-Wave’s breakthrough isn’t an isolated event, either. Quantum advances are happening at a rapid clip, folks.

Earlier this year, Google announced its quantum chip, Willow, which can execute calculations millions of times faster than traditional supercomputers. (We covered that here.) Amazon also recently unveiled its Ocelot quantum processor, and Microsoft recently launched Majorana 1, another quantum computing milestone. (I gave an overview of these chips here.)

Each of these breakthroughs confirms something critical: Quantum computing is rapidly transitioning from theory to practical application.

Big Tech recognizes this. And so does NVIDIA, the undisputed leader in generative AI chips. In fact, it’s already moving aggressively into quantum computing – even before its Q-Day event:

  • It launched CUDA-Q, a quantum-classical hybrid platform, to help bridge the gap between traditional computing and quantum. The platform is specifically designed to integrate quantum processing units (QPUs) with NVIDIA’s graphics processing units (GPUs). As such, it could be the bridge to NVIDIA’s future beyond this decade.
  • It’s actively developing quantum simulation tools, giving developers access to quantum-like environments before real hardware is widely available.
  • And major industry players are already lining up to integrate NVIDIA’s tech into their quantum programs.

NVIDIA knows quantum computing will become essential once traditional computing hits its limits later this decade. And that’s why I hosted my Next 50X NVIDIA Call summit on Thursday.

But here’s the thing. As this news from D-Wave demonstrates, quantum computing isn’t just the future – it’s happening right now.

And while I like D-Wave, it is NOT my No. 1 pick in this space.

On March 20, I expect NVIDIA to make a MAJOR announcement with my No. 1 pick. And I covered all the details you need to know in my Next 50X NVIDIA Call summit.

The Future Is Happening NOW

It’s important to understand that as more (and bigger) groundbreaking advances are made, so too will the headlines.

Quantum computing today is where AI was back in 2016, right before NVIDIA’s historic 7,000% surge to its peak.

Remember, when I came across NVIDIA in May 2016, this was well before ChatGPT came along. That didn’t happen until November 2022. Now, NVIDIA has returned more than 600% since then… but the reality is most people missed out on the 6,400% gains before that.

The fact is, at some point, quantum computing will have its “ChatGPT moment.”

It could happen at NVIDIA’s Q-Day on March 20. But even if it doesn’t, you’ll want to get in on this before the crowd, and time may be running out…

And by the time the mainstream public catches on to quantum computing, the truly massive gains will already be made.

That’s why I’ve been urging investors to position themselves early.

And one way to do that is by investing in the small-cap quantum computing stock perfectly positioned to profit from NVIDIA’s quantum push. This company holds 102 patents and already works closely with NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and NASA.

Don’t wait until the market fully catches on. Watch the replay of my Next 50X NVIDIA Call now for all the details – before it’s taken down.

Click here to watch NOW.

Sincerely,

Louis Navellier

Editor, Market 360

Louis hereby discloses that as of the date of this email, Louis, directly or indirectly, owns the following securities that are the subject of the commentary, analysis, opinions, advice, or recommendations in, or which are otherwise mentioned in, the essay set forth below: NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)



Source link

4 Reasons Why the Stock Market Meltdown May Have Ended


The stock market has been stuck on a roller coaster for months now, zooming up and down ever since November’s U.S. presidential election. 

But over the past few weeks, stocks have been experiencing a particularly painful rout, with the S&P 500 crashing more than 10%, the Nasdaq falling about 15%, and the Russell 2000 collapsing nearly 20%.

But amid this Wall Street chaos, we see a fantastic buying opportunity unfolding. 

In fact, we think stocks may have bottomed this past week – and they could soar from here over the coming months. 

There are four critical tenets to our bull thesis… 

The Stock Market Is Washed Out, But the Economy Isn’t

First, things feel washed out. 

As we mentioned, the major indices have taken a plunge, dropping between 10% and 20%. All three have now fallen into oversold territory. 

Meanwhile, valuations on a lot of individual stocks have dropped to 2- or 5-year lows. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index has crashed to one of its lowest levels in the last 50 years. And investor sentiment in the American Association of Individual Investors’ (AAII) weekly survey has only been this consistently bearish once before – back in March 2009. 

Across the board, things are just really washed out. When conditions are this dour, stocks can rebound furiously as they climb the proverbial ‘wall of worry.’ 

Second, the economic reality is not so bleak. 

We understand Americans’ concerns about tariffs, federal spending cuts, policy uncertainty, and their potential impacts on consumer spending and business investment.

But as of now, at least, those impacts are still contained. 

As we noted in yesterday’s issue, U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth is still positive at 2.3%. Consumer spending is steady. Unemployment is low at 4.1%. Inflation is falling, currently hovering around 2.8%. At about 4.3%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, wage growth is strong and running above inflation. And as the fourth-quarter earnings season illustrated, corporate profits are still growing, with more than 75% of the S&P 500 exceeding consensus estimates. 

So… sentiment and market conditions are washed out, but the economy is not. This divergence is not sustainable. 

Either the economy becomes just as washed out, or sentiment and market conditions rebound. We don’t see the economy nose-diving anytime soon, and therefore, we think a rebound is coming.

Calling the Bottom

Third, multiple technical signals suggest this could be the bottom for stocks, as we’ve detailed over the past week

The Nasdaq 100 just fell below its 200-day moving average for the first time in a year. Similarly, the S&P 500 dropped below its 250-day moving average for the first time in a year. The market has become oversold, again for the first time in a year. 

All this happened this past week. And historically speaking, when these things have occurred before, the market usually went on to soar over the next 12 months, so long as stocks stabilized around these major technical levels… 

Which also happened this week. 

The S&P 500 fell multiple times toward the ultra-critical 5,500 level and never gave it up. It bounced every time. This past Tuesday, it bounced right above there and then did so again multiple times on Thursday. Then, stocks soared on Friday and – as of this writing – the S&P retook its 250-day moving average. 

Stocks are stabilizing exactly where they should. From a technical perspective, that tells us that the market has found a bottom and that stocks will soar over the next few months.



Source link

Why the Latest Inflation Reports Matter for Future Rate Cuts


We’ve been talking about quantum computing a lot lately – and rightfully so.

After all, Big Tech is making major investments in it, including Alphabet Inc. (GOOG), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). They’re developing quantum chips that can perform computations in seconds that would normally take a classic computer thousands of years to complete.

But of all the Big Tech companies, I think NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is on the path to becoming the leader, which it will make clear to all the other quantum players next Thursday, March 20, when it hosts its Quantum Day, or “Q Day.”

This is where I predict NVIDIA will make a major announcement. Not only will it cause my No. 1 pick to take off like a rocket, but it will also fuel a fresh rally to help turn the entire market around. (For more details on the event, click here and watch a replay of my summit, The Next 50X NVIDIA Call.)

But the reality is we can’t take our eye off what else is going on in the markets right now.

You see, tariffs have continued to weigh on investors.

On Tuesday, March 4, Trump implemented 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, as well as the 20% tariffs on China. That sent the stock market spiraling lower. Even though President Trump backpedaled and postponed some of the tariffs on Canada and Mexico until April, it was too little, too late for many investors. And this week, he placed a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, and threatened a 200% tariff on alcoholic products from the European Union (EU) if it doesn’t remove the tariff on imported American whiskey.

I know that a lot of investors are rattled by the ongoing “tit for tat” between President Trump and Canada, Mexico, China and Europe.

Obviously, a lot of people in the media aren’t fans of President Trump. And I will acknowledge that he can be a bit erratic. But the ultimate goal of all this is to have free trade.

For example, the European Union charges a 10% tariff on American cars imported into Europe. The U.S., on the other hand, charges 2.5%.

You get the idea.

The fact is this is really up to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

I know Howard Lutnick – my son went to school with his son, and I think he’s a wonderful guy. He’s going to be a cheerleader for America, and the ultimate goal is to have trillions in onshoring.

This “tit for tat” has certainly weighed on the markets, but thankfully, some positive data mid-week helped bring some investors off the sidelines. I’m talking about the latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Producer Price Index (PPI) reports.

These reports were critical, because investors and consumers alike are beginning to feel pressured by all this tariff talk.

The Federal Reserve is feeling the heat as well. So, in today’s Market 360, let’s take a look at this week’s latest inflation reports and what they mean for future key interest rate cuts. Then, I’ll share more about how you can take advantage of the next investment opportunity that could turn the entire market on its head.



Source link

Is This Bounce Buyable? | InvestorPlace


Markets erupt higher… is this rebound real or a temporary?… diagnosing why stocks are falling… the dance between sentiment and earnings… don’t miss Louis Navellier’s 50X small-cap idea

As I write Friday, stocks are ripping higher.

Is this the beginning of a sustained, bullish rebound? Or bullish fool’s gold before the next leg lower?

To help answer this, let’s diagnose the problem.

The market currently has a “sentiment” problem.

The good news is that – at least for the moment – it’s not an “earnings” problem as well. And that should limit how much downside remains in front of us, if there’s any at all.

Let’s break this down.

There are two key variables that influence the price of each stock you own

  • The earnings of your underlying companies
  • The multiple that investors are willing to pay for those earnings – which we can think of as “investor sentiment”

In the short-run, investor sentiment is unquestionably the greatest influence on stock prices.

On any given day, gleeful or despondent investors can drive stocks to unfathomable heights or depths based on greed and fear.

But in the long run, stock prices always return to their true master: earnings.

To illustrate, check out the chart below that shows us the key drivers of stock performance over various lengths of time.

The column on the left shows us the drivers over one year. “Multiple” (which means “investor sentiment”) is in red; it’s the dominant influence at 46%. Revenue growth (the basis for “earnings”) is in blue; it accounts for just 29% of stock-price performance.

But see how this flips the further out you go (the columns to the right).

Chart showing how in one year, sentiment is the primary driver of a stock price, but the farther out you go, the more it's about fundamental strength (revenue growth)

Source: Morgan Stanley / The Future Investors

After 10 years, sentiment drives just 5% of stock performance.

For another angle on this, below is a chart dating to 1945 comparing the S&P 500’s price to its trailing 12-month operating earnings.

Notice how over the long-term, these two lines have an amazingly strong correlation. This underscores our point: In the long-run, earnings drive stock prices.

But also, you’ll see how the S&P’s price line (in green) bounces all around the S&P’s much smoother earnings line (in blue).

This is showing us how price – pushed and pulled by sentiment – soars and crashes… yet always returns to the earnings line.

A chart spanning from 1945 to Q3 of last year. It compares the S&P’s price to its trailing 12-month operating earnings. They are highly correlated

Source: Investment Strategy Group, Bloomberg, S&P Global

So, where are we with this earnings/sentiment dance today?

In recent weeks, the stock market has been tanking largely due to the investor sentiment part of the equation

And this just prompted legendary investor Louis Navellier’s favorite economist, Ed Yardeni, to lower his S&P 500 forecast.

Yardeni has been one of Wall Street’s leading bulls in recent years – which has been the correct call. Today, he remains broadly bullish. To that end, he hasn’t changed his forecast for 2025 earnings, but he’s pulling back on his sentiment multiple.

From MarketWatch:

Yardeni is sticking with his view that S&P 500 companies will earn a combined $285 per share…

But he is blinking on the valuation multiple, now expecting a range of 18 to 20 instead of 18 to 22.

That takes Yardeni’s best-case scenario down to 6,400 from 7,000 (and also his year-end 2026 view down to 7,200 from 8,000). His “worst-case scenario” for the end of 2025 is now down to 5,800.

The good news is that Yardeni’s updated “worst-case scenario” still has the S&P climbing almost 4% from where it trades as I write.

This isn’t to say that Yardeni doesn’t recognize the potential for earnings to take a hit. Here he is, with a warning:

The latest batch of economic indicators released on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday supported our resilient economy scenario with subdued inflation.

Nevertheless, we can’t ignore the potential stagflationary impact of the policies that Trump 2.0 is currently implementing haphazardly.

But Goldman Sachs has, in fact, lowered its earnings forecast due to tariff wars

It’s not a drastic reduction, from $268 to $262. For perspective, the broad Wall Street consensus is $270.

Here’s MarketWatch explaining:

[The reduced earnings forecast is] in reaction to Goldman’s economists earlier this week lowering their GDP view on expectations of a 10-percentage-point tariff-rate increase.

The simple math is that every five-percentage-point increase in the tariff rate reduces S&P 500 earnings by 1% to 2%.

The new earnings forecast also took into account elevated uncertainty and tightening financial conditions.

Meanwhile, like Yardeni, Goldman also lowered its sentiment multiple. But again, not by much – from 21.5 to 20.6.

From Goldman:

The headwinds to equity valuations from a spike in uncertainty are typically relatively short lived.

However, an outlook for slower growth suggests lower valuations on a more sustained basis.

But here, too, Goldman sees stocks climbing from here to end of 2025, even after its reduced forecast. It puts the S&P at 6,200 by year-end, which is 11% higher.

So, if earnings are remaining relatively robust in these projections, then might this “sentiment” correction be healthy?

Yes.

At the end of last year, sentiment had reached bullish extremes. That type of enthusiasm is fun, but it’s flimsy and usually doesn’t last for too long.

Below, we look at the S&P 500’s price in light blue compared with the change in the S&P’s forward 12-month earnings estimate dating to 2015.

Notice how price (in this case, our loose proxy for sentiment) had soared far higher than earnings estimates coming into 2025.

Chart showing the S&P 500’s price in light blue compared with the change in the S&P’s forward 12-month earnings estimate dating to 2015. Notice how price (in this case, our loose proxy for sentiment) had soared far higher than earnings estimates coming into 2025.

Source: FactSet

So far, given that earnings are holding up well, the pullback has reflected waning sentiment – but this has meant that the price/earnings divergence has narrowed to a more reasonable level.

If we want a long-term bull, this is good news. It’s like letting some air out of an overinflated balloon.

But will this pullback remain a relatively mild “sentiment” drawdown or intensify into a “sentiment + earnings” bear?

That’s the question.

After all, a “sentiment” pullback would mean we should be looking for great buying opportunities today. A “sentiment + earnings bear” would suggest a defensive posture.

Here are some numbers on the two scenarios…

MarketWatch found that when stocks fall 10% but don’t enter a recession, buying the S&P (after it has fallen 10%) has delivered gains six months later nearly 90% of the time (using data since 1980).

But if both sentiment and earnings take a hit, resulting in a bear market, the median S&P 500’s peak-to-trough pullback would be a 24% decline.

Let’s return to the question…

Do we need to be prepared for another massive leg lower in stocks due to an earnings collapse?

It doesn’t appear that way currently.

Here’s FactSet, which is the go-to earnings analytics group used by the pros:

For Q2 2025 through Q4 2025, analysts are calling for earnings growth rates of 9.7%, 12.1%, and 11.6%, respectively.

For CY 2025, analysts are predicting (year-over-year) earnings growth of 11.6%.

It’s going to be very hard to have a deep, sustained bear market with that kind of earnings growth.

Meanwhile, FactSet reports that while executives have been discussing tariffs on their earnings calls, they haven’t been mentioning “recession” with any great urgency.

Back to FactSet:

Through Document Search, FactSet searched for the term “recession” in the conference call transcripts of all the S&P 500 companies that conducted earnings conference calls from December 15 through March 6.

Of these companies, 13 cited the term “recession” during their earnings calls for the fourth quarter.

This number is well below the 5-year average of 80 and the 10-year average of 60.

In fact, this quarter marks the lowest number of S&P 500 companies citing “recession” on earnings calls for a quarter since Q1 2018.

But what about the recent GDP reduction that points toward a recession?

To make sure we’re all on the same page, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow Tool provides a “nowcast” of the official GDP estimate prior to its release by using a methodology similar to the one used by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

As I write, it’s showing a steep contraction of -2.4%.

Chart showing the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow Tool provides a

Source: Atlanta Fed

We need to take this with a big grain of salt.

To explain why, here’s Louis from Wednesday’s Flash Alert podcast in Breakthrough Stocks:

The data doesn’t support us going into a recession.

Now, I’ve mentioned to you folks that the trade surpluses are ridiculous because companies were dumping goods on America.

The first indication was the 34% surge in January. We’ll see what the February trade number will be, but that could cause negative Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

However, according to the Institute of Supply Management (ISM), manufacturing has been growing for two months in a row after contracting for 26 months, and services actually picked up.

The U.S. is a predominantly service-led economy, so the data doesn’t support the narrative that we’re going into a recession.

Circling back to our focus on earnings, Louis is the perfect person to chime in on today’s theme of “sentiment” and “earnings”

After all, as we highlighted in yesterday’s Digest, Louis’ entire approach to the market centers on identifying stocks displaying fundamental strength.

True to form, here’s what Louis said on Wednesday to his subscribers:

I want to reassure you that earnings are working.

I also want to reassure you that when we had this very sharp correction that analysts never cut their estimates…

We’ll keep an eye on everything, and we’ll just keep you in the crème de la crème – the best stocks.

Speaking of crème de la crème, a reminder that Louis just flagged his top quantum computing stock. He believes it has 50X upside potential as quantum computing technologies hits the mainstream (there’s breaking news on this that we’ll feature in Saturday’s Digest – be on the lookout).

Louis also pointed toward a key catalyst happening this coming Thursday – Nvidia Corp.’s (NVDA) “Quantum Day.” Here’s Louis:

Next Thursday,I believe Nvidia will stake its claim in the quantum computing space. And when it does, this little-known top pick could erupt overnight.

Yesterday, I revealed everything you need to know about Q-Day – including details on my No. 1 stock pick that could explode in the wake of NVIDIA’s announcement.

To check out Louis’ full presentation, click here.

Coming full circle…

So, what are we to conclude from all this?

Here’s the quick-and-dirty:

  • Our current drawdown is largely “sentiment” driven. At present, that gives the edge to this being a buying opportunity
  • Based on current earnings forecasts, it’s unlikely we’ll devolve into an earnings recession, which would usher in a more damaging bear market
  • However, tariff wars could change the calculus depending in their severity and duration
  • Focusing on the earnings strength of your specific stocks is the best way to avoid unnecessary stress – or kneejerk decisions – in a market climate such as this one.

We’ll keep you updated.

Have a good evening,

Jeff Remsburg



Source link

How to Navigate This Market Correction – and Come Out Ahead


This past Tuesday marked the five-year anniversary of when the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a “pandemic.”

Following the news, investors panicked and the markets crashed. While this was five years ago, I want to bring this up today because the folks at Bespoke Investment Group recently pointed out that the S&P 500’s actions over the past three weeks have been eerily similar to the same three-week period in 2020.

You may recall that the S&P 500 peaked and hit a new all-time high on February 19, 2020, then plunged for three weeks. In 2020, the S&P 500 lost more than 19% during those three weeks as the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown intensified.

Now, I want to remind you that the same three-week period in 2025 has been terrible – but not nearly as horrible as 2020.

Consider this: The S&P 500 peaked and broke through to a new all-time high on February 19, 2025. Since then, the index dropped by about 10% by yesterday’s close, officially ending in “correction” territory. Now, a bounce back in the markets today may pull it out… for now, at least.

But the tech-heavy NASDAQ has been in full-blown correction territory for a few days now.

The point is, whether we’re talking about 2020 or today, one thing is clear: Uncertainty is the source of the selling.

Today, we’re once again looking at a grossly oversold stock market – and I know that you’re wondering if and when a rebound will occur.

Well, it could be happening now. The markets closed on an incredibly positive note today. But stocks often bounce back – by a lot – in market corrections before retesting lows.

So, in today’s Market 360, I’d like to take some time to talk about what corrections are, why the markets have been selling off lately and why you shouldn’t panic. Then, I’ll explain the catalyst that I think will turn this market around, starting next week…



Source link

Why Awful Consumer Sentiment Data Makes Us Excited About Stocks


Consumers are feeling gloomy about the economy right now… and the University of Michigan’s awful Consumer Sentiment Report shows that the outlook is only getting worse. 

There’s no other way to put it – consumer sentiment is crashing. The university’s headline index dropped from 64.7 in February to 57.9 in March, its lowest level since November 2022. 

The Current Conditions Index dropped to 63.5, its lowest since September 2024. And the Expectations Index dropped to 54.2, its lowest since July 2022. 

Across the board, consumer sentiment is collapsing. But this is not a new trend; it’s been happening all year long. 

Over the past three months, consumer sentiment has dropped by 21%, its largest three-month crash since the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic in summer 2020.

That’s ugly data. 

However, as we all know, there’s perception, and there’s reality. 

In reality, are things really that bad?

At 2.3%, gross domestic product (GDP) growth is still positive. Consumer spending is steady. Unemployment is low at 4.1%. Inflation is falling, currently hovering around 2.8%. At about 4.3%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, wage growth is strong and running above inflation. And as the fourth-quarter earnings season illustrated, corporate profits are still growing, with more than 75% of the S&P 500 exceeding consensus estimates. 

Sure, we have ongoing tariff drama and policy uncertainty. But the economy still remains on solid footing. 

So, while sentiment is in the basement right now, the real economy appears to be doing just fine. 

That could change, of course. But as of right now, economic conditions are pretty normal. 

That’s why we think consumer sentiment will rebound over the next few months – and as that happens, stocks should, too…

Is the Bottom Near?

Consumer sentiment is currently being walloped by tariff drama, federal spending cuts, and policy uncertainty. But we think all those dynamics will ease in the coming months. 

In our view, the Trump administration is front-loading these moves so it can pave the way for other things – like a big tax cut package and more deregulation – which should boost consumer sentiment. 

That is, we believe temporarily bad policy developments are weighing on consumer sentiment. But as the administration shifts focus in the coming months, consumer sentiment should rebound. 

The data seems to agree with this thesis.

The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index has crashed to levels that are historically considered the “bottoming zone.” 

Since 1980, consumer sentiment has oscillated violently between really low and really high readings. But it has consistently bottomed in the 50 to 60 range. 

In 1980, amidst the Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate-hiking cycle, it bottomed at 52. In 2008, it bottomed at 55 during the financial crisis. It bottomed at 56 in 2011 during the European sovereign debt crisis and at 50 in the thick of 2022’s inflation crisis. 

The consumer sentiment index just dropped below 58. Historically speaking, we’ve reached the bottoming zone. 

If this truly is the bottom, then this could be a really good time to be buying stocks

Because big consumer sentiment rebounds out of the bottoming zone – like we saw in the early 1980s, coming out of the GFC, in 2012/13, and in 2023/24 – coincided with major market rebounds



Source link

The Shortcut for Finding the World’s Best Businesses


Think of a stock’s dividend history as a “cheat sheet” for assessing whether it’s worth your money

You can spend a lot of time searching for stocks to buy.

You can study for hours and learn how to analyze stock charts and corporate balance sheets. You can spend hours going over financial statements.

But if you’re like a lot of people, you don’t have the interest or the time. You’ve got a job and a family, and they keep you busy.

The good news is there’s a shortcut around doing all that work.

You can simply look for businesses that have increased their dividends for at least 10 years in a row.

Remember, dividends are cash payments distributed to a company’s shareholders. Only businesses with durable competitive advantages can pay increasing dividends for more than a decade (on top of all their other financial obligations).

Out of the more than 5,000 publicly traded businesses, less than 5% of them meet this high standard of quality.

These businesses are the beachfront real estate of the stock market.

Some legendarily profitable and stable members of the “dividend raiser” club include:

  • Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)
  • McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD)
  • Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP)
  • IBM (NYSE:IBM)
  • PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP)
  • 3M (NYSE:MMM)
  • Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT)
  • Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG)
  • Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO)
  • Chevron (NYSE:CVX)
  • ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM)

The longer the string of consecutive dividend increases, the more impressive it is. Only truly fantastic business with durable competitive advantages can increase their dividends for 20, 30, or even 40 consecutive years.

As of 2019, discount retailer Wal-Mart has increased its dividend payment every year for 44 years. Oil giant ExxonMobil has increased its dividend payment every year for 36 years. Soft-drink giant Coca-Cola has increased its dividend payment every year for 56 years.

These businesses paid and increased their dividends through recessions, government shutdowns, wars and real estate busts. They paid their dividends during the dot.com bust. They paid their dividends during the 2008–2009 financial crisis — the ultimate dividend “stress test.”

In terms of consistency, these firms rank just behind the rising sun.

Companies with more than 10 or 20 years of consecutive dividend increases are the strongest, safest companies in the world. Many of these firms sell “basic” products like medicine, soda, food, candy, cigarettes, toothpaste and deodorant.

Ordinary companies can’t raise their dividends for 10 or 20 consecutive years. In fact, they probably won’t even exist that long. This is because their business models are shaky, unpredictable and vulnerable to competition.

The average investor will spend lots of time chasing hot tips from brokers, coworkers and relatives. He’ll chase “get rich quick” schemes. He’ll try to pick stocks based on chart patterns. He’ll stay up at night worrying about the risky stocks he owns.

It’s bizarre behavior when you realize there is a group of elite, dividend-paying businesses available to him. He’s choosing SPAM over filet mignon.

Instead of owning risky stocks, I like the predictability of owning robust, reliable businesses like McDonald’s and Coca-Cola.

I can’t pick the next hit website, the next miracle drug, or the next retail fad — but I know it’s very, very likely that folks will keep eating burgers, drinking soda, and brushing their teeth.

Again, you can spend lots of time learning how to analyze business… you can spend a lot of time searching for them. Or, you can simply “weed out” over 99% of stocks by focusing on companies with long strings of consecutive dividend increases.

Several of these lists are compiled each year. One is called “Dividend Achievers.” It’s the list compiled by NASDAQ of companies that have increased their dividends for at least 10 consecutive years. As of 2019, there were 264 members of this list.

Another list is called “Dividend Aristocrats.” It’s the list of S&P 500 companies that have increased their dividends for 25 consecutive years. As of 2019, there are only 57 members of this list.

You can think of these lists as “cheat sheets” for finding the world’s best businesses.

You work hard for your money. Don’t abuse it by investing in low-quality businesses.

Instead of buying unproven business based on whims, chart patterns, and hot tips, demand quality from the businesses you buy.

One of the greatest indicators of business quality is at least 10 years of consecutive dividend increases. This is the blue ribbon worn by the best public businesses.

Over at Profitable Investing, my friend Neil George has done more “due diligence” on this than the folks at NASDAQ or S&P Dow Jones.

And of the many stocks Neil covers, he recommends just a handful of stocks that have raised their dividends for 10 years or more, plus meet Neil’s other criteria. Click here to find out more about Neil and how he picks stocks.

Regards,

Brian

P.S. Once a particular “dividend raiser” catches your eye, the next step is to consider the price. Too many investors think you have to pay up for great investments. That just isn’t true. And I’ve got a simple strategy to buy elite stocks at bargain prices.



Source link

How to Prepare Your Portfolio for a Recession – InvestorPlace


Humans are hardwired to pay close attention to potential dangers.

A hundred thousand years ago, it’s how we survived. Constantly worrying that a tiger or bear might be around the corner was a valuable instinct.

We may not encounter bears or tigers anymore, but our instincts remain a part of who we are. We still pay close attention to potential dangers.

A recession may be the potential danger that most frightens investors like us.

Recessions usually inflict some damage on portfolios, and at times they can be downright destructive. The economy and stock market always recover, but it can take some investors years or even decades to get back on track.

If you study the history of economic recessions in the United States, you see that almost all of them up until the Great Depression in 1929 were referred to as “panics.”

The Panic of 1873… the Panic of 1893… the Panic of 1907.

Those all resulted in runs on banks, because depositors feared their financial institutions would not be able to fulfill withdrawal requests. These panics led to the formation of a national bank in 1913, which we know today as the Federal Reserve System.

Bank runs are not much of a thing anymore, but we do see panic selling in the market whenever fear overcomes investors:

  • Fear of inflation.
  • Fear of rising interest rates.
  • Fear of war, trade disputes, and other global socioeconomic events.
  • And, ultimately, fear of a recession.

Even hints or speculation of a recession looming on the horizon are enough to scare the wits out of investors. The result is often uncertainty to the point of gridlock. Investors don’t know whether to stuff their money under the mattress, back up the truck and buy, or do something in between.

As I write this in the second quarter of 2022, signs and speculation of a possible recession have increased, so you are in good company if you’re more worried and confused than just a few months ago.

A recent Bank of America monthly fund manager survey showed that investors are more concerned about the global economy than they have been since the financial crisis of 2007-’08.

Deutsche Bank became the first major bank to predict the United States will enter a “mild” recession later in 2022 into early 2023. Moody’s Analytics put the chances of a recession at 33%, and Goldman Sachs is in the same ballpark at 35%.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, arguably the most powerful person in banking, wrote to shareholders in early April 2022 that the global economy will slow, and that “it could easily get worse.”

InvestorPlace’s advisors all agree that a recession is indeed possible. The odds have increased as the war in Ukraine further ignited already hot inflation at 40-year highs. They are all watching carefully.

Still, this is where our survival instinct can be helpful. If those potential dangers help us invest smarter and fortify our portfolios, we can be better prepared to avoid those catastrophic losses that are so difficult to recover from.

Now is the perfect time to consider how you’ll manage your portfolio during a recession. Even if we don’t get one, it’s still a worthwhile exercise to consider ways to protect your portfolio from painful losses that cost money and time.

Recessions Hurt

The simplest definition of a recession is two or more consecutive quarters in which the economy contracts. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NEBR) makes the “official” call on recessions, and it considers many more factors than that. (If you’re interested, you can dive into the details here.)

NEBR uses trailing data, so keep in mind that recessions can only be declared looking in the rearview mirror. By the time a recession is identified, both the economy and the stock market may have already been through the worst of it and could even be turning around.

That said, economists, investors, business owners, and consumers alike can often “feel” when they’re in a recession due to what they see in the world, in the news, and on their balance sheets.

Consumers tend to cut back on discretionary spending, corporate revenues slow down, companies cut back on manufacturing, and unemployment rises as more people find themselves out of work.

Recessions have lasted anywhere from a grueling 65 months (in very different times in 1873) to a quick two months. That two-month recession, the shortest in U.S. history, is also very recent. It hit in early 2020 as COVID-19 emerged and much of the nation – and the world – shut down.

The NEBR said that recession lasted from February 2020 to April 2020, and they made that announcement on July 19, 2021… more than a year after the fact. Anyone waiting for official word to get back into the stock market missed one heck of a rally, as you can see in the S&P 500 level chart below.

A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from January 2020 to July 2021.A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from January 2020 to July 2021.

Recessions over the last 80 years, since World War II ended, lasted 11.1 months on average. That makes very short and long recessions the exception rather than the rule, but investors ignore any recession at their own risk.

Believe it or not, stocks can actually go up during recessions. In fact, they often do. The market looks forward, so as we just saw in 2020, stocks often turn higher even as a recession is ongoing. This chart from Hartford Funds shows that stocks gained during seven of the 13 recessions since 1945.

A chart showing how the S&P 500 performed in the past 13 recessions.A chart showing how the S&P 500 performed in the past 13 recessions.

Source: InvestorPlace

The overall average for all 13 recessions was +3.7%. Of the seven recessions when stocks were up, the average gain was 16%. And of the six when stocks lost ground, the average loss was 10.7%.

So this may come as a surprise: Recessions aren’t necessarily catastrophic for stocks. At the same time, they can be costly in terms of both money and time.

The most recent recession discussed above was an outlier in how quickly stocks recovered to new highs. Stocks took much longer to recover from the prior recession that occurred from December 2007 to June 2009 – the so-called “Great Recession” sparked by the subprime mortgage and financial crises. You can see the sharp rally off the March 6, 2009, bottom, but then it took almost another four years for the S&P 500 to get back to where it was before the recession.

A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from 2008 to 2013.A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from 2008 to 2013.

We see a similar pattern in the 2001 recession from March to November, which was when the whole dot-com bubble burst. The S&P 500 rallied in late 2001 as the recession was ending, but then fell to new lows in 2002. It took until fall of 2005 for the S&P 500 to fully recover.

A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from 2001 to 2006.A chart showing the levels of the S&P 500 from 2001 to 2006.

The Nasdaq Composite got hit even worse, taking a full 15 years to top the all-time highs from 2000 prior to the recession.

In this report, we’ll show you five ways to invest in a recession. But like we said before, we don’t officially know about recessions until after the fact.

So first, let’s look at a few recession “indicators” that can tell us about the economy’s status well before the NBER makes its official call.

The #1 Recession Indicator

The NBER doesn’t make the official determination of a recession until after the fact, but there are indicators that can point to the possibility. Perhaps the most frequently watched recession indicator – because it’s the most accurate – is what’s called the “yield curve.”

As I write this in mid-2022, it’s understandable why investors are so nervous. The bond market has been flashing plenty of warning signs lately, with the Treasury yield curve briefly inverting for the first time since 2019 and the end of March and in early April.

The yield curve refers to the relationship between short-term interest rates and long-term interest rates, specifically as paid out by bonds. In a normal market, long-term bonds pay a higher rate – or yield – than short-term bonds. This makes sense, as investors expect a higher return for tying their money up for a longer period of time.

You can see a normal yield curve in the chart below, which John Jagerson and Wade Hansen shared with their Strategic Trader readers in early April. The black line is the long-term yield (10 years), and red line shows the short-term yield (two years).

A chart showing the general yield curves of the short-term and long-term rates.A chart showing the general yield curves of the short-term and long-term rates.

Source: InvestorPlace

The yield curve “flattens” when long-term and short-term rates are about the same, and it “inverts” when short-term yields pay more than long-term yields. An inverted yield curve is concerning because it affects banks’ profits and is often a precursor to a recession.

The most important and closely watched yield curve is the spread between 10-year and 2-year Treasury bond yields. This spread, when it goes negative, has correctly predicted every recession over the past 50 years.

That’s what happened at the very end of the first quarter. At the beginning of 2022, the 2-year and 10-year yields started coming closer together until the 2-year yield (purple line) briefly popped above the 10-year (orange line).

A chart showing the yields over time of the 2-year and 10-year treasuries, with the 10-year briefly dipping below the 2-year in 2022.A chart showing the yields over time of the 2-year and 10-year treasuries, with the 10-year briefly dipping below the 2-year in 2022.

Timing is critical to note here because an inverted yield doesn’t historically signal an immediate recession. In fact, it is usually an opportunity for a period of time.

Luke Lango, InvestorPlace’s Chief Investment Strategist, highlighted the data for his subscribers:

The last three 10-2 inversions didn’t happen at stock market tops – they happenedbefore stock market booms.

In 1988, the 10-2 spread went negative. Stocks rallied 33% over the next 20 months. A decade later, the 10-2 spread inverted again. Stocks rallied 40% over the next 22 months. In 2006, the 10-2 spread also inverted. And over the next 20 months, stocks rallied 22%.

A chart showing the time difference between when the yield curve inverts and when the S&P 500 hits a peak.A chart showing the time difference between when the yield curve inverts and when the S&P 500 hits a peak.

Source: InvestorPlace

In other words, yield curve inversions do predict recessions – but they’re really early in doing so. And, in the time between when the yield curve inverts and the U.S. economy dips into a recession, the stock market tends to party in a big way.

Other Recession Indicators

The yield curve may get the most attention, but it isn’t the only sign of a possible recession on the horizon.

There is also what’s called “stagflation” – a time of high inflation, slowing economic growth, and low unemployment. This is the situation now. The concern here is that the Federal Reserve needs to raise rates to combat inflation, but higher rates make it difficult for businesses to borrow money, which can result in hiring and keeping fewer employees.

Successfully navigating this balance results in the “soft landing” you hear so much about, but investors often turn cautious – sometimes overly cautious – before it’s known whether the landing will be hard or soft.

Consumer confidence is also another indicator economists and investors watch closely when assessing the odds of a recession. The logic here is simple: Consumer spending accounts for roughly 70% of the economy. If confidence wanes and spending drops, the economy can slow or even shrink.

There are also multiple factors that influence consumer confidence and spending, like how many people have jobs and how many are out of work. Real income measures essentially the purchasing power of consumers by adjusting personal income for inflation. Employment may be high currently, but wages have lagged inflation since early 2021.

Wholesale and retail sales tell us about demand for goods, as does manufacturing. If you want a less scientific indicator, you can check men’s underwear sales. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said many years ago that underwear is the last piece of clothing men buy, so if sales of those are down, it may mean people are holding on to more of their money.

Now that we’ve gone over a few ways we can tell if a recession may be on the way or not, let’s get to what you can do about it – the opportunities that can be found during a recession…

The first thing to know about investing during recessions is that they always end. The track record is without blemish. As we discussed earlier, the bigger question is how long they will last, and how much money and time they will they cost investors.

There are multiple strategies to consider when investing in a recession:

Strategy #1: A Stash of Cash

Cash is not the most exciting thing to think about when it comes to investing, but don’t underestimate its importance – especially in recessionary times.

Cash provides a ballast for your portfolio and dampens overall volatility. It is as low risk as you can get. It won’t grow, unless you can get a good interest rate on a savings or money market account, but $1,000 in cash today will still be $1,000 in cash tomorrow no matter how much the stock market falls (even if its purchasing power declines a little due to inflation).

Cash is also the proverbial “dry powder” that enables you to pounce on opportunities. And as we’ll talk more about in a moment, there will be opportunities. Even good stocks trade at bargain prices during tough economic times and market selloffs.

At the same time, you don’t want to overestimate the importance of cash either by getting out of the market completely. This can happen when investors panic and emotions take over. Too often, investors end up taking bigger losses than they needed to.

To be clear, we are talking here about cash in your investment portfolio. From a personal finance perspective, you also want to have some cash on hand for emergencies like loss of a job or an unexpected repair to your car or home. And from a financial planning perspective, you want little if any of the cash you need right now or will need in the very near future invested in stocks. It’s just too unpredictable.

Strategy #2: Stocks That Typically Do Well in a Recession

There are several tried-and-true investments that typically outperform during a recession. That is, they gain more and/or lose less than many other stocks. As you would expect, these are industries that can maintain demand levels or even increase demand during tough economic times as well as some of the biggest companies in those industries…

  • Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals: Our need for healthcare and medicines doesn’t change just because the economy does. Examples include pharmaceutical companies like Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Pfizer Inc. (PFE), biotech companies like Abbvie Inc. (ABBV) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN), medical equipment companies like Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and Medtronic PLC (MDT), and healthcare services and providers like Unitedhealth Group Inc. (UNH) and CVS Health Corp. (CVS). We also have medical software and technology companies such as Cerner Corp. (CERN) and Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) that help healthcare providers do more for less cost.
  • Utilities: We still need water, electricity, and gas to live, so demand tends to remain steady, even during tough economic times. Many utility stocks also pay solid dividends, which investors seek in down markets and times of inflation. (See below.) Among the biggest are Nextera Energy Inc. (NEE), Dominion Energy Inc. (D), Atmos Energy Corp. (ATO), and American Water Works Company Inc. (AWK).
  • Home and auto maintenance: If consumers cut back spending, they will likely delay major purchases like new homes and cars. That means spending money to maintain current homes and cars. Hardware stores like Home Depot Inc. (HD) and Lowe’s Companies Inc. (LOW) stores often see an uptick in sales during recessions, as do auto supply stores such as O’Reilly Automotive Inc. (ORLY) and Autozone Inc. (AZO).
  • Consumer staples: People may not go to restaurants as much when money is tight, but that doesn’t mean they stop eating. They may not go to the movies as much, but that doesn’t mean they don’t need entertainment. Demand for food, beverages, cleaning supplies, personal products, and the like usually remains fairly steady. Some of the biggest consumer staples companies include Procter & Gamble Co. (PG), Coca-Cola Co. (KO) and Pepsico Inc. (PEP), and Unilever PLC (UL).
  • Discount stores: Makes sense, doesn’t it? You still need things when times are tough, so might as well get them at the lowest prices you can find. That means discount retailers can benefit. Think dollar stores, warehouse clubs, and even just big chains with lower prices – stores like Walmart Inc. (WMT), Target Corp. (TGT), Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST), and Dollar General Corp. (DG).

Many investors like to put their money into dividend-paying stocks when they fear a recession. History would say it is worth investing some of your portfolio in dividend stocks in good times and in bad.

According to S&P Global, dividends account for 32% of the S&P 500’s total returns since 1926. Fidelity says that in the 90 years from 1930 to 2020, dividends constituted nearly 40% of total returns.

A chart showing the breakdown of gains in the S&P 500 every decade from the 1930s to the 2020s between dividends and stock price appreciation.A chart showing the breakdown of gains in the S&P 500 every decade from the 1930s to the 2020s between dividends and stock price appreciation.

Source: Fidelity

Let that sink in. Somewhere around one-third of the market’s total returns going back nearly a century come from dividends.

A solid dividend also tends to make the payer’s stock less volatile, and the income from the dividend helps counter any drops in the share price. Wall Street sees such stocks as safer investments, and investors seek safety in turbulent markets and economies.

Dividends are not guaranteed. They can be cut by the company if need be, so you want to look for a strong dividend history and strong company cash flow to minimize the chances of dividends being slashed.

Strategy #3: Long-Term Buying Opportunities

In times of recession, stocks can fall because their underlying businesses are not doing as well. That’s understandable.

But stocks often fall too much as fear takes over, and making investment decisions based on any emotion can lead to shortsighted thinking and costly mistakes.

The term “panic selling” is accurate, and when investors sell out of fear, they don’t care what price they are getting back. They simply want out. As with selling anything from a stock to a home, you’re going to get a lower price if you’re desperate to get rid of it.

The buyer, on the other hand, walks away with a real bargain.

Stocks usually move based on a company’s earnings and revenue growth. Every once in a while, especially during times of economic unease like a recession, war, or unexpected scare, that pattern breaks down. As a result, companies still growing their earnings and revenues see their share prices diverge from the underlying fundamentals. Smart investors can sometimes buy a dollar of earnings growth for mere pennies.

Luke Lango has done some fascinating research on what he calls “divergence” and the resulting opportunities:

In my early years as an investor, I remember reading book after book, studying lecture after lecture, and talking to hedge fund manager after hedge fund manager to figure out what type of investment style fit me best.

And by “fit me best” I mean to say I was trying to figure out what investment style would make me the most money.

My questions were answered when I came across an earlier version of the following chart. It graphs the earnings per share of the S&P 500 alongside the price of the S&P 500 from 1988 to 2022.

A chart showing the level of the S&P 500 and the operating EPS of the S&P 500 from 1988 to 2020.A chart showing the level of the S&P 500 and the operating EPS of the S&P 500 from 1988 to 2020.

Source: InvestorPlace

As you can see, the blue line (earnings per share) lines up almost perfectly with the orange line (price). Indeed, the mathematical correlation between the two is 0.93, which is about as close as it gets.

I was convinced after seeing that chart. Clearly, earnings drive stock prices. Forget the Fed. Forget inflation. Forget geopolitics. Forget trade wars, recessions, depressions, and financial crises.

We’ve seen all of that over the past 30 years – and yet, through it all, the correlation between earnings and stock prices never broke or even faltered very much.

But at certain times in history, including here in the first part of 2022, earnings and revenues have not driven stock prices. This divergence is due to macroeconomic fears.

When people get fearful in the stock market, they sell first and ask questions second. They don’t care about fundamentals. Fear on Wall Street sparks a mad dash for the exits.

One period of great divergence Luke identified was 2001 when the dot-com bubble burst and the economy tumbled into a recession. His research shows how that turned out to be one of the best opportunities to buy internet stocks, and he cited Amazon as a prime example:

From December 1999 to September 2001, Amazon dropped a mind-boggling 92%. During that stretch, revenues rose 82%. This was a massive divergence the market had never seen before.

The result? A rally like the market hadn’t seen yet, either.

Within a year, Amazon stock had soared 166%. Within two years, it had risen 707%. Two decades later, it is up 52,860%.

A chart showing the divergence of Amazon's stock price and revenue between 1997 and 2004.A chart showing the divergence of Amazon's stock price and revenue between 1997 and 2004.

Source: InvestorPlace

Of course, taking advantage of undervalued stocks requires a willingness to tolerate volatility and a long-term investment horizon. As a recession gathers steam, it’s impossible to know for sure when investors will get past their fears and start focusing again on fundamentals.

But when they do, quality companies with growing businesses in transformative megatrends can rally further and faster than the market.

Strategy #4: Hedging and Shorting

If you want to take a more active approach to managing your portfolio during recessions and tough markets, you can consider both hedging to dampen downside risk and shorting to profit from stocks that go down.

InvestorPlace macro expert Eric Fry, a former hedge fund manager, says that hedging is really about making money no matter what the market does…

It is a return that is not dependent upon, or relative to, market direction. It does not require nourishment from a bull-market trend.

Over the decades since [A.W.] Jones launched his new-fangled fund, a wide variety of hedge-fund strategies have emerged. Although many of them still focus on buying and selling short stocks, others utilize some combination of bonds, currencies, futures, private equity investments, derivatives, and what-have-yous.

No matter the exact tactics, most hedge funds attempt to construct some type of “market-neutral” portfolio that can generate a positive absolute – no matter if the stock market is rising or falling.

In theory, therefore, “market-neutral” strategies are the fat-free ice cream of investing. They deliver at least some of the good stuff while eliminating almost all the bad stuff.

In its simplest form, a market-neutral trade would feature two halves: one half that bets on some sort of up move, paired against a second half that bets on some sort of down move.

But of course, a perfectly market-neutral trade would never produce a profit or a loss; it would only produce a breakeven result because the gain on one half would perfectly offset the loss on the other half.

Obviously, the goal is not to be that neutral.

Instead, a market-neutral trade attempts to profit when the two halves of the trade combine to produce a profit. Importantly, however, both sides of a market-neutral trade do not need to produce a profit, in order for the entire trade to produce one.

The most direct way to bet on a down move is through shorting a stock. Be aware, though, that shorting is risky and more complicated than buying shares. It also requires you to have a margin account, which allows you to borrow from your broker. Like any other type of loan, you need to pay interest, and you need to pay back what you’ve borrowed.

Shorting a stock means selling it first. If that sounds impossible, here’s how it works: When you identify a stock you believe will go down, you “borrow” shares from your broker and sell them on the open market. The goal is to then buy those shares back at a lower price, return them to your broker, and keep the difference as profit.

You still hope to buy low and sell high, but just in reverse order.

Say you borrow shares of XYZ stock and sell them right away for $20 a share. XYZ then dips to $15, so you buy them back and return them to your broker, keeping the $5 a share as your profit (minus any interest and fees).

The risk, of course, is that the stock you shorted goes higher, and then your losses can mount quickly. Mathematically speaking, the most you can make shorting a stock is 100% if the stock goes to $0, but your downside risk is theoretically infinite if the stock price keeps going higher and higher.

That’s when short-sellers “cover” by buying shares back and taking the loss. You can also be forced to cover if the brokerage issues a “margin call” and essentially demands that you return the shares you borrowed.

You can hedge your portfolio without directly shorting a stock by concentrating on investments that tend to zig when the market zags. We talked above about types of stocks that often outperform during recessions when the market falls.

You can also hedge by investing in inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are basically short ETFs that are built to move in the opposite direction to the market or a specific index. For example, if the S&P 500 is down 1.5% on a given day, the ProShares Short S&P 500 ETF (SH) would be up 1.5%. You can find inverse ETFs on most any investment index, sector, or theme.

We’ll let Eric have the last word on hedging and how to think about it:

We investors do not need to swing for the fences every time we step the plate. Sometimes, it’s a good idea to shorten our swings and try to hit singles. Heck, it’s even good to get hit by a pitch.

And when times get really tough, select short sales or other portfolio hedges can help a portfolio “score runs” when most typical investment strategies are striking out completely.

Because short sales produce profits from falling stock prices, they can provide a valuable “hedge” to your conventional portfolio. To be sure, short sales can be risky, even when they are part of a market-neutral trade. But so can owning stocks during a bear market.

Therefore, for those folks who are eager to investigate the mysterious, alluring (and risky) world of hedges that can profit directly from falling stock prices, take a look at the final story in this month’s issue.

On the other hand, if you have no interest in advanced “Hedging 2.0” strategies, no problem. Most of us don’t like betting against companies, or the idea that we will lose money if a stock increases in value.

I get it. There are other, less scary forms of hedging, like gold stocks, oil stocks, and “inverse funds” like the ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TBF).

Although “indirect hedges” like these do not automatically rise when the overall is falling, the last few weeks have demonstrated that they can deliver big gains amid market turmoil.

Strategy #5: Built a Crisis-Proof Portfolio in Advance

If the past 30 years of history have taught us anything, it’s that smart investors need to “harden” their financial lives and investment portfolios.

We’ve talked about many of these crises already, from the worst pandemic in a century to the Great Recession of 2007-’08 and the bursting of the 2000 tech bubble.

Moreover, we live in a world rife with cybercrime and financial scams and wars.

And we live in a world where stock market drops occur with disturbing regularity, whether they are from a recession or wars or pandemics or any number of other causes.

For these reasons, building and maintaining a “hardened” financial life to grow your wealth safely is one of the smartest moves you can make for yourself and your family.

As one of the world’s largest investment research firms, InvestorPlace hand selects and recommends many stocks and other investments each year. However, the world’s best investment ideas aren’t worth much if they don’t fit inside a robust all-weather portfolio that can make you money during good times and keep you safe during the bad times.

In fact, asset allocation is arguably more important than stock picking when it comes to successful investments and building wealth safely,.

Asset allocation is the part of your investment strategy that dictates how much of your wealth you place in broad asset classes like stocks, bonds, cash, commodities, precious metals, and real estate. Ideally, you want a diversified mix of assets that greatly limits your exposure to a big decline in one asset class.

There’s no “one size fits all” asset allocation strategy that is right for everyone.

When you (possibly with the help of a financial advisor) think about your right “mix,” you must consider your age, your risk tolerance, and your goals. A 50-year-old who is paying college tuition for three children will think about asset allocation much differently than a 32-year-old with no family.

However, most of us have a similar goals. We want to own a diversified collection of assets that throws off income… even when we are not actively working. We want to buy high-quality assets for bargain prices. We want to keep the financial damage a recession inflicts on us to a minimum.

Having all that means being diversified across private businesses, stocks, bonds, real estate, cash, precious metals, and insurance.

While deciding what allocation works best for you, consider some of these factors:

If you’re younger and more comfortable with the volatility involved in stocks, you can keep a stock exposure to somewhere around 50%-75% of your portfolio. A young person who can place a significant chunk of their wealth into stocks and hold them for decades stands to do very well. But they will have to go through some volatile times.

If you’re older and/or can’t stand risk or volatility, consider keeping a significant portion of your wealth in cash and bonds, perhaps even as much as a 75%-85% weighting.

Near the end of your career as an investor, you’ll likely be more concerned with preserving wealth than growing it, so you’ll in turn likely want to be very conservative.

Whatever mix you choose, just make sure you’re not overexposed to an unforeseen crash in one particular asset. This will make your hardened wealth plan as “crisis proof” and “inflation proof” as possible.

Rely on the Proven Basics

Preparing your portfolio for a recession can mean incorporating strategies specific to the market and the economy at that time.

But it also means sticking to the basics that have proven their worth through recessions, bear markets, and just every other situation.

Have some cash to live on and for emergencies.

Try to minimize big hits to your portfolio by diversifying among asset classes. You never want to be too dependent on any single asset class or even one investment within an asset class.

Dividends can provide both income and stability to your portfolio.

When investing in stocks, stay focused on the long term. The short term is too unpredictable.

Keep emotions out of it. The market is famous for panic selloffs, and it can be tempting to join the crowd when you see your stocks falling. Selling out of fear is rarely the right decision, especially if the long-term outlook for your stocks hasn’t changed.

Most of all, remember that recessions end and bear markets end. They can be painful and stressful when they are happening, but the market and the economy always recover. The bias of capitalism is growth, which makes the bias of the market higher.

Build a smart portfolio.

Avoid the catastrophic losses.

Stay patient.

If you can do those, you’ll be in the best position possible to weather a recession – and other negative market events – and continue on the path to wealth and financial freedom.

 



Source link

The #1 Way to Invest for Retirement


Finding the few, elite dividend payers is all that’s truly important for growing wealth in the stock market

If you know nothing about the stock market except what I’ll explain here today, you’ll be a vastly better investor than almost everyone on Wall Street… or any MBA… or anyone on CNBC.

What I’m going to share with you is a “secret” in the sense that few people use it. It’s really an “open secret.” Nobody has it under lock and key. It’s hiding under an invisible blanket of common sense.

When you start putting this secret to work for you, you’ll “graduate” into a higher class of investor.

Right now, you’ve probably got some money in the stock market: You probably have a 401(k), an IRA, or an individual brokerage account.

Once you’ve invested some money, you probably started watching a little financial television.  You probably read financial websites or a few investment magazines.

While reading and listening to financial media, you’re sure to encounter dozens of “gurus” who promote lots of different market strategies… and make lots of big predictions. You’re sure to see lots of news stories about the economy and the government.

It’s a lot to take in. It can all be very confusing.

And for 999 out of 1,000 people, it distracts them from what really leads to long-term success in stocks.

You see, the news you read in the paper or hear on CNBC is completely meaningless compared to the idea I’ll share with you now.

Most people watch the financial news and think they’re doing something important. They’re actually just wasting time and getting distracted from what’s truly important for making big, safe returns in the stock market.

And what’s truly important for growing wealth in stocks is the accumulation of elite, dividend-paying businesses purchased at reasonable prices.

That’s it.

It’s the most important idea.

It’s the “king” of all investment ideas.

It’s a thousand times more important than knowing what the economy is doing… or what the government is doing… or what’s happening in the news.

Again… what’s truly important for growing wealth in stocks is the accumulation of elite, dividend-paying businesses purchased at reasonable prices.

What is an elite business?

How can you find them?

And how can one safely and surely generate wealth for you?

The Traits of Elite Businesses

There’s no set definition of an “elite business.” But most smart people agree that elite businesses share some unique traits.

An elite business has a durable competitive advantage over its competitors.

For example, Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) has a durable competitive advantage because its huge global distribution network allows it to sell goods at unbeatably low prices. It’s very, very difficult for smaller firms to compete against it.

An elite business usually has an outstanding brand name. Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) is a good example. People associate Coke’s logo and name with quality soda all over the world.

An elite business is often the largest business in its industry.  When you run your business better than the competition, you usually can’t help but become the biggest. McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) became America’s biggest fast food chain because it ran a better business than its competitors.

An elite business often sells “basic” products, like food, oil, soda, cigarettes, beer, mouthwash, razor blades and deodorant. These are things that don’t go out of style.

And here’s something you don’t often hear: Most of the truly elite businesses sell habit-forming, or even addictive, products.

If you look at the list of the 50 Best Stocks of All Time (July 1926 through  December 2016), you’ll note many of them sold habit-forming products. It jumps right out at you.

For example, Philip Morris, rebranded a few years ago to Altria (NYSE:MO), is right near the top of the list — creating $470.2 billion of wealth in its lifetime. It sells cigarettes, which contain addictive nicotine.

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) are on the list. They sell soda… which is a sugar and caffeine delivery vehicle.

People love a little sugar rush. It’s habit forming… even addictive.

PepsiCo’s business includes Frito-Lay, and salty snacks stay strong even when sugar gets a backlash.

Many big drugstore brands are on the list. These names include Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT) — whose products include Ensure nutrition drinks and Similac baby formula — Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE:BMY), Merck (NYSE:MRK) and Pfizer (NYSE:PFE).

People get very accustomed to filling a prescription, over and over. Much of the time, those drugs are useful, although sometimes they are not. And the same goes for your favorite brand of beer. I’m not saying these things are good or bad. I’m simply pointing out that people get very accustomed to them.

You can make the case that certain fast foods are addictive as well. Fast food companies load their food with fat, sugar and chemicals that make people want more. This is part of the reason McDonald’s has been such a corporate success.

The businesses I just mentioned produced more than 13% annual gains for over three decades.

Those returns are extraordinarily rare in the stock market. You won’t find anything better.

An investment of $25,000 in a tax-deferred account that grows 13% per year for 30 years grows to nearly one million dollars ($977,897).

Most companies can’t sustain 13% annual returns for more than five years.  The businesses I just mentioned sustained those returns for decades.

And the reason why they did so well is simple…

Why Habit-Forming Products Are Such a Cash Cow

When people form a habit around a product, it goes a long way towards ensuring repeat business.  People get used to certain brands, and they grow resistant to switching.

Also, when people get used to a product and the brand surrounding it, they are more likely to continue buying the product even if the price increases a little. Both of these help companies sustain long-term sales growth and healthy profit margins. That’s good for shareholders.

It’s also important to know that when these companies hit upon the right recipes or the right mix of whatever it takes to make good products, they don’t have to make large, ongoing investments in the business. They don’t have to spend tons of money on more research and development.

Once Coca-Cola hit upon Coke, it didn’t have to change it. The same goes for Budweiser and Hershey (NYSE:HSY) and Tootsie Roll (NYSE:TR).

When you develop a product that people love and develop habits around, you don’t tinker with it. You don’t have to spend a lot of money on new research and development. You don’t have to buy expensive high-tech equipment. You can instead spend that money on things that will provide a high return on investment, like marketing, distribution or manufacturing.

This means a larger percentage of revenues can be sent to shareholders.

Owning the world’s top sellers of basic (often habit-forming) products is also ideal for investing in high-growth emerging markets like China and India.

Combined, China and India have about 10 times the population of the United States. Many of those people are at the level of economic development of 1940s America… and they are getting a little richer every year. It’s one of the biggest investment opportunities in history.

To invest in this trend, I don’t want to try and guess what websites will get the most clicks… or what retailer will become popular. That’s a very difficult game to play. Those business landscapes will change rapidly.

On the other hand, I’m very confident those folks in China and India who are getting a little richer every year will want to enjoy the same habit-forming products Americans have enjoyed for decades.

They’ll want to consume more branded soda, cigarettes, beer, liquor and processed foods.

Owning elite, global businesses that serve those growing markets makes a lot of sense.

By the way… these global sellers of branded, habit-forming consumer goods are the kinds of businesses Warren Buffett, the greatest investor in history, always looks to buy. He’s a long-time owner of soda-maker Coca-Cola and candy maker See’s Candies.

My friend Neil George also owns several big-name, habit-forming brands in his portfolio for Profitable Investing — a portfolio that has a long track record of correctly timing (and profiting from) trends ranging from gold and real estate booms to income stocks. You can check out Neil’s latest findings at this link.

Regards,

Brian

P.S. Besides habit-forming products…there’s another key element that the best-performing stocks share.



Source link

The Secret of High Stock Market Returns


Looking back at nearly 40 years of performance data, there’s a clear pattern of which stocks can deliver big returns

When a great business develops a durable advantage over its competitors, it often begins paying steady and rising dividends.

Dividends are cash payments distributed to a company’s shareholders. They are often quoted in dollars per share, as in “Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) pays a dividend of $1 per share.”

Dividends are also quoted in terms of a percent of the current stock price. This percentage is referred to as the “yield.” You might say, “Coca-Cola pays a dividend yield of 3%.”

The respected investment research firm Ned Davis Research produced a study that shows why investors should care a lot about dividends.

This study contained some of the most valuable data you’ll ever see.

Understanding this data can make you rich. Not understanding it can cost you years of wasted effort and lots of money. I’ll show you this data in a simple table.

You shouldn’t invest one dime in the stock market unless you understand it.

In the study, Ned Davis Research analyzed the returns of various types of stocks within the benchmark S&P 500 index from 1972 to 2016.

Ned Davis Research placed each S&P 500 stock into one of four general categories:

  1. They placed companies that were reducing or eliminating their dividend payments into one category.
  2. In another category, they placed companies that didn’t pay dividends.
  3. In another category, they placed companies that were paying dividends, but not increasing them.
  4. In another category, they placed companies that were paying dividends and were increasing them.

In other words, Ned Davis Research categorized stocks based on their policies of paying cash to shareholders.

You could say two of the categories (reducing dividends or not paying dividends) consisted of businesses that were generally not good at paying cash to shareholders.

You could say one category consisted of companies that were okay at paying cash to shareholders (paying dividends, but not increasing them).

You could say the fourth category consisted of stocks that were great at paying ever-increasing amounts of cash to shareholders (paying dividends and raising them).

According to the study, companies that paid growing dividends returned an average of 9.86% per year. Companies that were paying dividends but not increasing them returned an average of 7.33% per year. Companies that did not pay dividends returned an average of 2.46% per year. Companies that were cutting or eliminating their dividends returned -0.47% per year.

Here is that data shown in a table:

Source: Ned Davis Research

 

The results of the over 40-year study are clear: Companies that are great at paying cash to shareholders perform better than companies that stink at it. As the ability to pay dividends increases, returns go up. As the ability to pay dividends declines, returns go down.

Continuously rising dividends are a mark of business excellence. And business excellence translates into big shareholder returns.

“Wait a minute,” you might say. “If I only buy stocks that don’t pay dividends, won’t I miss out on big growth stock winners that invest their profits into growing the business instead of paying it to shareholders?”

To this objection, I say, “Yes, you will.”

By sticking with dividend-paying stocks, you will miss out on investing in the next Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX)… or the next Facebook (NASDAQ:FB).

But remember, for every winner like Starbucks, there are 1,000 failed coffee chains.

For every winner like Facebook, there are 1,000 failed websites.

It’s very, very unlikely that the average investor will be able to consistently find these companies early on… and hold them for years. Even trained professionals struggle (and often fail) to pick those kinds of winners.

It’s much, much more likely the average investor will be able to consistently identify companies that sell boring, basic products like soap, burgers and beer… and pay ever-increasing dividends.

By now, you know those companies are usually found in your refrigerator, cupboard or medicine cabinet.

If you’re interested in building long-term wealth in the stock market, consider changing the way you look at different stocks.

Consider placing each business you come across into one of four simple categories.

And only buy businesses that fit into one of those categories: the rising dividend category.

Does the business pay rising dividends, stagnant dividends, no dividends, or is it reducing dividends?

If the business doesn’t pay continuously rising dividends, pass on it. Here’s a simple rule of thumb for you to follow.

Buy the best and ignore the rest!

Regards,

Brian

P.S. My friend Louis Navellier is all about Elite Dividend Payers. But he wouldn’t let you leave here today without the chance to tell you about a couple more criteria…

A few simple requirements for any stock to get a coveted A rating from Louis, who’s been nicknamed the “King of the Quants.” The New York Times says he’s “an icon among growth investors.”

Louis calls these stocks “Money Magnets.” And you can check out the latest from Louis at this link.



Source link