Archives March 2025

10 Super High Dividend REITs With Yields Up To 16.8%


Updated on March 3rd, 2025 by Bob Ciura

Investors looking to generate higher income levels from their investment portfolios should look at Real Estate Investment Trusts or REITs.

These are companies that own real estate properties and lease them to tenants, or invest in real estate backed loans, both of which generate a steady stream of income.

The bulk of their income is then passed on to shareholders through dividends.

You can see all 200+ REITs here.

You can download our full list of REITs, along with important metrics such as dividend yields and market capitalizations, by clicking on the link below:

 

The beauty of REITs for income investors is that they are required to distribute 90% of their taxable income to shareholders annually in the form of dividends. In return, REITs typically do not pay corporate taxes.

As a result, many of the 200+ REITs we track offer high dividend yields of 5%+.

But not all high-yielding stocks are automatic buys. Investors should carefully assess the fundamentals to ensure that high yields are sustainable.

Note that while the securities in this article have very high yields, a high yield alone does not make for a solid investment. Dividend safety, valuation, management, balance sheet health, and growth are also very important factors.

We urge investors to use the analysis below as informative but to do significant due diligence before buying into any security – especially high-yield securities.

Many (but not all) high-yield securities have a significant risk of a dividend reduction and/or deteriorating business results.

Table of Contents

You can instantly jump to any specific section of the article by using the links below:

High-Yield REIT No. 10: Community Healthcare Trust (CHCT)

Community Healthcare Trust is an REIT which owns income-producing real estate properties linked to the healthcare sector, such as physician offices, specialty centers, behavioral facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and medical office buildings.

The trust has investments in 197 properties in 35 states, totaling 4.4 million square feet.

Source: Investor Presentation

On February 18th, 2025, Community Healthcare Trust reported fourth quarter results for the period ending December 31st, 2024.

Funds from operations (FFO) per share dipped 16% to $0.48 from $0.57 in the prior year quarter. Adjusted FFO per share, however, declined by 10% to $0.55.

During the quarter, Community Healthcare acquired three properties for $8.2 million. These properties were 100% leased with lease expirations through 2029.

The trust also has seven properties under definitive purchase agreements, with a combined purchase price of roughly $170 million, expected to close from 2025 through 2027.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on CHCT (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 9: Chimera Investment Corp. (CIM)

Chimera Investment Corporation is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that is a specialty finance company. The company’s primary business is in investing through subsidiaries in a diversified portfolio of mortgage assets, including residential mortgage loans, Non-Agency RMBS, Agency CMBS, and other real estate related securities.

Chimera’s income is predominantly obtained by the difference between the income the company earns on its assets and financing and hedging costs.

The company funds the purchase of assets through several funding sources: asset securitization, repurchase agreements (repo), warehouse lines, and equity capital.

On May 21st, 2024, Chimera executed a 1-for-3 reverse stock split due to its depressed stock price, which resulted from the impact of high interest rates. This was a negative development.

In mid-February, Chimera released (2/12/25) results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024. Its core earnings-per-share edged up sequentially, from $0.36 to $0.37, thanks to lower provisions for credit losses. Chimera missed the analysts’ consensus by $0.01.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on CIM (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 8: Innovative Industrial Properties (IIPR)

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is a single-use “specialty REIT” that exclusively focuses on owning properties used for the cultivation and production of cannabis.

As of the end of 2024, IIPR had 109 properties, with a weighted average lease length of 13.7 years. Approximately 92% of IIPR’s properties are industrial, with retail comprising 2% and blended properties the remaining 6%.

Source: Investor Presentation

On February 19th, 2025, IIPR released its Q4 and full-year results for the period ending December 31st, 2024. For the quarter, revenues and normalized AFFO/share were $76.7 million and $2.22, down 3% and 2.6% year-over-year, respectively.

The decline in revenues was due to lost rent and fees from properties repossessed or sold since 2023, lease amendments that adjusted and deferred rent on certain properties, and (iii) partial rent payments from some tenants, along with reclassified sales-type leases starting January 2024.

These factors were offset by $3.9 million from a disposition-contingent lease termination fee, revenue from new acquisitions, and contractual rent escalations.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on IIPR (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 7: Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT)

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust invests in residential mortgage loans and mortgage-related assets. PMT has three segments: credit sensitive strategies, interest rate sensitive strategies and correspondent production.

PennyMac Mortgage began its operations in 2009 with $324 million of assets, which has grown to $13.1 billion as of September 30th, 2024. PMT is externally managed by PNMAC Capital Management, which itself is a wholly owned subsidiary of PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI).

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust reported fourth quarter 2024 results on January 30th, 2025, for the period ending December 31st, 2024. PMT reported net investment income of $107.9 million, which was a 27% jump from NII of $84.8 million in the prior year quarter.

The trust generated $0.41 per share profit in the quarter, which was a 7% decrease from the year-ago quarter.

The book value per share increased from $15.85 on September 30th, 2024 to $15.87 on December 31st, 2024. In the fourth quarter, the company added $60 million in new mortgage servicing rights (MSRs).

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on PMT (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 6: AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC)

American Capital Agency Corp is a mortgage real estate investment trust that invests primarily in agency mortgagebacked securities (or MBS) on a leveraged basis.

The firm’s asset portfolio is comprised of residential mortgage passthrough securities, collateralized mortgage obligations (or CMO), and nonagency MBS. Many of these are guaranteed by governmentsponsored enterprises.

AGNC Investment Corp. reported strong financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024. The company achieved a comprehensive income of $0.63 per common share, driven by a net income of $0.39 and other comprehensive income of $0.24 from marked-to-market investments.

Net spread and dollar roll income contributed $0.43 per share.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on AGNC Investment Corp (AGNC) (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 5: Arbor Realty Trust (ABR)

Arbor Realty Trust is a nationwide mortgage real estate investment trust (REIT) that acts as a direct lender and operates in two reporting segments: Agency Business and Structured Business. The trust provides loan origination and servicing for multifamily, seniors housing, healthcare, and other diverse commercial real estate assets.

Arbor Realty’s specific focus is government-sponsored enterprise products, although its platform also includes commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), bridge and mezzanine loans, and preferred equity issuances.

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) reported third-quarter 2024 results with net income of $0.31 per diluted common share, matching expectations, and distributable earnings of $0.43 per share. Revenue reached $88.81 million, a 17.23% year-over-year decrease but still beating estimates by $3.10 million.

The company declared a cash dividend of $0.43 per share and announced agency loan originations totaling $1.1 billion, supporting a $33.01 billion servicing portfolio, which grew 10% year-over-year. Structured loan originations reached $258.5 million, contributing to a $11.57 billion portfolio.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on ABR (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 4: Dynex Capital (DX)

Dynex Capital invests in mortgagebacked securities (MBS) on a leveraged basis in the United States. It invests in agency and nonagency MBS consisting of residential MBS, commercial MBS (CMBS), and CMBS interestonly securities.

Source: Investor Presentation

Dynex Capital released its fourth-quarter 2024 financial results, with book value ending the quarter at $12.70 per share and an economic return of 7.4% for the year.

Leverage increased slightly to 7.9x as the company deployed capital into higher-yielding agency RMBS, particularly 30-year 4.5%, 5%, and 5.5% coupons.

The shift from treasury futures to interest rate swaps was a key strategy, enhancing portfolio returns by 200 to 300 basis points and improving net interest spread.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on DX (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):


High-Yield REIT No. 3: Ellington Credit Co. (EARN)

Ellington Credit Co. acquires, invests in, and manages residential mortgage and real estate related assets. Ellington focuses primarily on residential mortgage-backed securities, specifically those backed by a U.S. Government agency or U.S. governmentsponsored enterprise.

Agency MBS are created and backed by government agencies or enterprises, while non-agency MBS are not guaranteed by the government.

Source: Investor Presentation

On November 12th, 2024, Ellington Residential reported its third quarter results for the period ending September 30th, 2024. The company generated net income of $5.4 million, or $0.21 per share.

Ellington achieved adjusted distributable earnings of $7.2 million in the quarter, leading to adjusted earnings of $0.28 per share, which covered the dividend paid in the period. Ellington’s net interest margin was 5.22% overall.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on EARN (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

High-Yield REIT No. 2: ARMOUR Residential REIT (ARR)

ARMOUR Residential invests in residential mortgage-backed securities that include U.S. Government-sponsored entities (GSE) such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

It also includes Ginnie Mae, the Government National Mortgage Administration’s issued or guaranteed securities backed by fixed-rate, hybrid adjustable-rate, and adjustable-rate home loans.

Unsecured notes and bonds issued by the GSE and the US Treasury, money market instruments, and non-GSE or government agency-backed securities are examples of other types of investments.

Source: Investor presentation

On October 23, 2024, ARMOUR Residential REIT announced its unaudited third-quarter 2024 financial results, reporting a GAAP net income available to common stockholders of $62.9 million, or $1.21 per common share. The company generated a net interest income of $1.8 million and distributable earnings of $52.0 million, equivalent to $1.00 per common share.

ARMOUR achieved an average interest income of 4.89% on interest-earning assets and an interest cost of 5.51% on average interest-bearing liabilities. The economic net interest spread stood at 2.00%, calculated from an economic interest income of 4.44% minus an economic interest expense of 2.44%.

During the quarter, ARMOUR raised $129.4 million by issuing 6,413,735 shares of common stock through an at-the-market offering program and paid common stock dividends of $0.72 per share for Q3.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on ARMOUR Residential REIT Inc (ARR) (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):


High-Yield REIT No. 1: Orchid Island Capital Inc (ORC)

Orchid Island Capital is a mortgage REIT that is externally managed by Bimini Advisors LLC and focuses on investing in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), including pass-through and structured agency RMBSs.

These financial instruments generate cash flow based on residential loans such as mortgages, subprime, and home-equity loans.

Source: Investor Presentation

The company reported a net income of $17.3 million, or $0.24 per common share, significantly improving from a net loss of $80.1 million in the same quarter last year. This net income comprised $0.3 million in net interest income and $4.3 million in total expenses.

Additionally, Orchid recorded net realized and unrealized gains of $21.2 million, or $0.29 per common share, from Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps.

Click here to download our most recent Sure Analysis report on Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC) (preview of page 1 of 3 shown below):

Final Thoughts

REITs have significant appeal for income investors due to their high yields. These 10 extremely high-yielding REITs are especially attractive on the surface, although investors should be aware that abnormally high yields are often accompanied by elevated risks.

If you are interested in finding high-quality dividend growth stocks and/or other high-yield securities and income securities, the following Sure Dividend resources will be useful:

High-Yield Individual Security Research

Other Sure Dividend Resources

Thanks for reading this article. Please send any feedback, corrections, or questions to [email protected].





Source link

Weekly Stock Grader: Upgrades & Downgrades for 164 Blue Chips


Are your holdings on the move? See my updated ratings for 164 stocks.

blue-chip stock upgrades and downgrades - Weekly Stock Grader Analysis: Upgrades & Downgrades on Top Blue-Chip Stocks

Source: iQoncept/Shutterstock.com

During these busy times, it pays to stay on top of the latest profit opportunities. And today’s blog post should be a great place to start. After taking a close look at the latest data on institutional buying pressure and each company’s fundamental health, I decided to revise my Stock Grader recommendations for 164 big blue chips. Chances are that you have at least one of these stocks in your portfolio, so you may want to give this list a skim and act accordingly.


Article printed from InvestorPlace Media, https://investorplace.com/market360/2025/03/20250303-blue-chip-upgrades-downgrades/.

©2025 InvestorPlace Media, LLC



Source link

Private Market Assets For The Masses


It used to be tough investing in private market assets. Typically, at least a couple of hundred thousand dollars was required, and you had to commit the money for up to 10 years or more. You had to be an accredited investor (sophisticated and experienced), and you had to be ready to fork over more capital in the future depending on the terms.

Not anymore. The development of open-ended, “evergreen” funds that allow investors to periodically redeem shares—typically, monthly or quarterly—and carry relatively low investment minimums have made private market investing accessible to just about everyone. The new funds’ investing strategies run the gamut. Some focus on specific sectors of the market while others are more diversified.

“Anyone can get exposure to private investments now,” says William Whitt, analyst with Datos Insights. “New fund structures are generating a lot of interest with retail investors.”

Evergreen funds are intended to attract investors further down the wealth spectrum from the traditional buyers of private equity and debt stakes. High-net-worth (HNW) investors, with more than $1 million in liquid assets, and the mass affluent, with less than $1 million, have virtually no holdings in private markets. En masse, they represent a huge new source of potential capital for private equity and debt managers to tap. A survey of alternative fund managers by Ernst & Young last year found that accessing private client capital was the top strategic priority for managers.

The number of funds being floated, largely by the biggest financial sponsors like Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo, is growing rapidly. According to FS Investments and Prequin data, more than 500 evergreen funds held over $400 billion in assets in 2023. Last October, KKR and mutual fund giant Capital Group filed to launch two hybrid fixed-income funds investing in public and private debt.

The filings underscore an effort to make private markets more accessible to a broader client base, the firms touted in a press release.

“The product structures are much more client-friendly and they’re bringing a lot more investors to the table,” says Mark Sutterlin, head of alternative investments at Bank of America and Merrill Lynch. “You need discipline to put together a diversified portfolio, but advisors can implement a plan in a more turnkey manner now.”

The development of the secondary market in private investments has also opened up opportunities for new buyers in the private space. Secondaries are existing stakes in private asset funds that are sold to other investors. The buyer gets into the fund later in the investment lifecycle but is still obligated to meet any further contracted capital calls from the general partner.

Some secondaries are simply the stakes of existing limited partners in the fund while others are transactions led by the general partner. The GP can use the money either to continue holding assets in the fund or to cash out existing investors. In some cases, investors can get discounts on secondary offerings, which will have a shorter time horizon than primary fund investments.

“Secondaries can be a good way to start an allocation,” says Trish Halper, CIO in the family office practice at Northern Trust. “They’re further along in the investment cycle and investors can get distributions quicker.”

Alternatives research firm Preqin is forecasting that secondaries will be the fastest growing segment of the alternatives market over the next five years.

The proliferation of new fund structures and the development of the secondaries market is bringing new investors to the private asset markets. Some close observers, however, are skeptical of this “democratization” of the market. “It feels like the latest fad,” Whitt says. “Everyone is running after it because everyone else is without really thinking about why.”     



Source link

2025 American Women Quarters Proof Set Released


Wrapping up a four-year series of proof sets featuring coins honoring women’s contributions to U.S. history, the United States Mint releases its 2025 American Women Quarters Proof Set today at noon ET.

US Mint image 2025 quarters proof set
U.S. Mint product image of its 2025 American Women Quarters Proof Set. The quarters are held in a protective lens and accompanied by a Mint certificate of authenticity.

The clad set includes five San Francisco Mint-struck quarters, marking the final issues in the Mint’s American Women Quarters™ Program. Each coin is in proof finish, featuring frosted design elements and mirror-like backgrounds – achieved through multiple strikes on polished planchets using specially prepared dies.

The set’s 2025 quarters honor:

  • Ida B. Wells – Investigative journalist, suffragist, and civil rights activist
  • Juliette Gordon Low – Founder of the Girl Scouts of the United States of America
  • Dr. Vera Rubin – Astronomer known for pioneering research on galaxy rotation
  • Stacey Park Milbern – Disability rights activist
  • Althea Gibson – Groundbreaking multi-sport athlete and the first Black player to break tennis’s color barrier

The individuals celebrated appear on the reverse (tails side) of their respective quarters, accompanied by inscriptions reading “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,” “E PLURIBUS UNUM,” and “QUARTER DOLLAR,” along with additional inscriptions specific to each honoree.

US Mint image 2025 proof quarters in lens
Another U.S. Mint product image, this one displaying the set’s lens containing the five proof quarters

The obverse (heads side) of each quarter shares Laura Gardin Fraser’s portrait of George Washington, originally designed in 1932 to commemorate his 200th birthday. Inscriptions include “LIBERTY,” “IN GOD WE TRUST,” and “2025.”

The American Women Quarters Program launched in 2022, with five releases issued each year as part of the series.

Price, Ordering and Limits

The 2025 American Women Quarters Proof Set is priced at $26.50. It is available directly from the U.S. Mint through its online store for quarter products.

All five coins are packaged in a single protective lens. The set has a product limit of 60,060, with a household order limit of five for the first 24 hours.

American Women Quarters are also included in other upcoming U.S. Mint products, such as rolls and bags of each quarter, other annual numismatic sets – including uncirculated sets, standard and silver proof sets – and holiday ornaments.



Source link

Manufacturing Growth Slows in February as Customers ‘Wait-and-See’ on Tariffs



Key Takeaways

  • The Institute of Supply Management’s manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) survey showed that the factory sector expanded in February, the second straight month of expansion after 26 straight months of contraction. 
  • However, the February reading was down from the month before and came in below economists’ expectations.
  • The prices paid index increased by 7.5 percentage points as tariff uncertainty also caused new orders to fall.

After nearly two years of lackluster production, the U.S. factory sector’s efforts to mount a comeback slowed in February, with a closely-watched industry survey showing that tariff worries were making manufacturers nervous.

The Institute of Supply Management’s manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) survey showed that the factory sector expanded in February with a 50.3% reading. It’s the second month in a row the index has registered above 50, indicating an expanding manufacturing sector, after 26 straight months of contraction. 

However, the February survey reading was down from the month before and came lower than economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires expected.

The report weighed on market sentiment Monday as investors have grown increasingly concerned about the health of the economy and the impact of policies being pursued by the Trump administration.

Tariffs Spur Concerns About Inflation

Selected commentary from the factory managers answering the survey pointed to worries over President Donald Trump’s tariff policy, which includes 25% levies on Canada and Mexico set to go into effect tomorrow

“New orders plunged into contraction in February as tariff uncertainty caused many downstream consumers to take a wait-and-see approach to expenses in 2025,” wrote Nationwide Senior Economist Ben Ayers.

The potential impact of the tariffs was already causing some real price increases for manufacturers, as the prices paid index rose by 7.5 percentage points to hit 62.4% in February.

“Prices growth accelerated due to tariffs, causing new order placement backlogs, supplier delivery stoppages and manufacturing inventory impacts,” said Timothy Fiore, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee.



Source link

Stock Picking Mastery: Identifying Tomorrow’s Champions Today


Editor’s note: “Stock Picking Mastery: Identifying Tomorrow’s Champions Today” was previously published in January 2025 with the title, “Stock Picking Mastery: An Exciting New Tool for Smarter Investing.” It has since been updated to include the most relevant information available.

I don’t know about you, but as someone heavily involved in stock analysis on a regular basis, I often feel like there must be a better way to approach the markets. Just imagine how much time you could save if, instead of poring over the details of each individual stock out there, you had a tool that could do so for you. Well, that’s exactly what we’ve aimed to create with Auspex, our latest stock picking system.

You may already be familiar. Indeed, in recent issues, we’ve offered glimpses into this tool’s inner workings. 

In short, Auspex leverages fundamental, technical, and sentimental data to help us find the stocks with the strongest possible setup. That way, we have the opportunity to get into the most promising stocks at the best time – before they go on to rise. 

We’ve spent several months developing, testing, even using Auspex to help us home in on such up-and-coming market winners. And today, we’re releasing the model’s top picks to buy for March. 

But… before you check out those latest trades… I would like to finish explaining just how this innovative model helps uncover the market’s future top performers.

That is, previously, we’ve discussed how Auspex uses a series of fundamental factors to narrow down a universe of ~14,000 potential picks to uncover just those that meet our very strict criteria.

And today, I want to explain how Auspex takes those fundamentally strong stocks and whittles the list down even further, ultimately landing on the best picks the market has to offer

Using Fundamentals, Technicals and Sentiment to Reveal Top Stocks

As we’ve mentioned previously, when we have Auspex scan the markets, it analyzes a universe of roughly 14,000 stocks. In our scan from early December, for example, only about 300 of those 14,000 stocks were deemed fundamentally strong, with accelerating sales and earnings growth and swelling profit margins.

But we don’t stop there. After receiving those results, we incorporate additional technical and sentimental parameters to continue paring down that list. And ultimately, only a few stocks make the final cut. For instance, out of 14,000 possible stocks, Auspex identified just 10 picks for the month of December.

OK… so, how does this system deem which stocks are worthy investments?

Well, when it comes to technicals, we’re essentially looking for stocks with strong upward price momentum.

We want to see the 200-day moving average (MA) sloping higher, indicating that the stock’s primary long-term price trend is positive. We also want to see the 50-day MA trading above the 100-day, as well as the 100-day trading above the 200-day MA. That indicates that short- and medium-term price momentum are both growing stronger. 

Additionally, positive action on the moving average convergence/divergence (MACD) line – with the MACD above the signal line – is also ideal. It’s another indication of strengthening price momentum. And, lastly, we want to make sure the stock isn’t “too hot” or overbought. That’s why we look for stocks where the relative strength index (RSI) measures less than 70. 

Now, on the sentimental side of things, we hope to find stocks that analysts are getting more bullish on and that have investors flocking to get positioned in. Specifically, we want to see earnings estimates moving higher and trading volume on the rise. 

Then we layer these technical and sentimental filters on top of the fundamental filters we’ve discussed to find the stocks that are strong in every way.



Source link

Monumental narrative shift – United States


Written by the Market Insights Team

Dollar between (-) macro and (+) geopolitics

Boris Kovacevic – Global Macro Strategist

Rising inflation expectations and tariff angst are threatening the path of the US economy towards a soft landing, a scenario that seemed increasingly more likely from October onwards. That was when economic momentum started gaining traction again as the labor market began outperforming expectations. The election of President Trump led to a one-off boost in confidence as small and medium sized enterprises bet on tax cuts and the cutting of red tape. Now this narrative is in danger of falling apart due to tariff confusion and lower growth.

Last week, for example, ended on a sour note as Trump and Zelenskiy clashed in the Oval Office due to multiple disagreements regarding the war in Ukraine. The joint press conference that should have followed was canceled, sending a stark signal to the rest of the world that an immediate peace deal seems out of reach. Geopolitics and tariff chatter have clearly been a net-negative factor for risk assets as of late.

To make matters worse, investors have started questioning the health of the US economy. Last week’s weaker than expected macro data and front-loading of imports before US companies are hit by tariffs lead to a drastic drop of growth expectations. The Atlanta Fed Nowcast for Q1 fell from 2.3% to 1.5%, a decline only seen during periods of significant turmoil or crises. Inflation published on Friday was in line with expectations with the PCE index rising by 0.3% m/m in January. However, personal spending fell by 0.2%, the first decline in almost two years.

The dollar rose for a third consecutive session and is currently only supported by the geopolitical uncertainty as the macro picture looks increasingly bad. Investors went from pricing in one rate cut by the Fed just days ago to now expecting three for 2025. This is reflected in Treasuries as well. The 2-year yield fell below 4% for the first time since October, matching the low of the US surprise index. This week’s labor market data will be the first large litmus test for the US economy and therefore the US dollar in some time.

Chart of USD index and USD push factors

Euro in the shadow of Trump

Boris Kovacevic – Global Macro Strategist

The euro is once again feeling the force that geopolitical uncertainty can have on sentiment and markets. European sentiment as of late has been improving, although at a slower than expected pace. The US macro picture seems to be deteriorating, and investors are back at pricing in three rate cuts from the Fed. At the same time is the narrative surrounding policy easing by the ECB becoming more complicated as inflation is picking up again.

However, none of this mattered for investors concerned with the spat between Trump and Zelenskiy and the falling implied probability of a peace deal being reached in the near term. The euro pushed lower for a second consecutive week and is once again trading below the $1.04 mark. Investors expecting the ECB meeting on Thursday to be a new catalyst to push the currency in either direction might be disappointed.

The 25-basis point cut is fully priced in, so it will be about the forward guidance to play the role of the market mover. However, the uncertain trade and geopolitical environment will likely mean that policy makers should remain caution and sensitive to the news flow. Today’s inflation print for the Eurozone is expected to show some deceleration in inflation pressures. The bigger catalyst for renewed selling pressure might once again come from the political or macro front. We would need a significant surprise on the US labor market report on Friday to see some price action of above $1.05 or below $1.03.

Chart of EURUSD and Ukraine peace probability

Swinging with risk sentiment

George Vessey – Lead FX & Macro Strategist

Having jumped to a more than 2-month high above $1.27 last week, GBP/USD is back flirting with the $1.26 handle following renewed geopolitical uncertainty as the hostile White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky threatens prospects of a US-brokered ceasefire with Ukraine and Russia. The risk sensitive pound slid against safe haven peers, but remains firm against the euro, with GBP/EUR closing the month above €1.21 for the first time since 2016.

The UK’s worsening net international investment position and the fact it has a persistent current account deficit leaves sterling reliant on foreign capital inflows. With this in mind, if we see a bigger drawdown in equity markets, then realistically the pound should come under pressure as well via the risk sentiment channel. However, on the trade front, Britain is way down on Trump’s list for tariffs, both because he likes the UK and because the UK-US trading relationship is much more balanced than most, with US actually having a goods trade surplus with the UK. This is why sterling is viewed as a tariff haven of sorts. Indeed, the FX options market reveals that one-week risk reversals are least bearish on sterling right now versus most of the G10.

The main upside risk for sterling this week is if President Trump reverses or delays increases to tariffs on Mexico and Canada that are scheduled for Tuesday as this would likely boost risk sentiment across the board. Moreover, if the influx of US data disappoints this week, particularly the labour market report on Friday, this could help the pound resume its recovery back above $1.27 versus the dollar.

Chart of G10 1-week risk reversals

Dollar jumps despite yield slump

Table: 7-day currency trends and trading ranges

Table of FX rates

Key global risk events

Calendar: March 3-7

All times are in GMT

Have a question? [email protected]

*The FX rates published are provided by Convera’s Market Insights team for research purposes only. The rates have a unique source and may not align to any live exchange rates quoted on other sites. They are not an indication of actual buy/sell rates, or a financial offer.



Source link

The Green Investment Puzzle | Global Finance Magazine


Investors are eager to spend trillions on energy transition, but too much money is piling into mature projects, while high-risk innovations struggle to attract backing.     

Will there be enough money in the world to save the planet? The answer to this urgent question is not straightforward.

Big-picture prognosticators name staggering sums needed to finance a greener future—and equally daunting shortfalls in securing them. Investment in the energy transition must more than double to $4.5 trillion annually to reach internationally agreed 2030 emissions targets, according to European financier Allianz. The US-based Boston Consulting Group (BCG) estimates an $18 trillion net-zero “capital gap,” in a late 2023 report.

The outlook for 2025 appears even more challenging. US President Donald Trump has reclaimed the office, vowing to dismantle the generous green subsidies his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, had advanced through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)—and to “drill, baby, drill” for oil and gas. High energy costs and farmer protests are eroding support for Europe’s ambitious transition agenda, while Canada is poised to roll back its precedent-setting carbon tax.

In financial markets, stubbornly high interest rates are keeping the cost of capital-intensive energy infrastructure elevated for longer. Meanwhile, a surge in data center construction, driven by AI, is supercharging electricity-demand projections—prompting a return to fossil fuel dependency. “One of these data centers can take as much power as a small city,” says Richard de los Reyes, a portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price’s New Era Fund. “There’s an increasing recognition that a lot of that will have to come from natural gas.”

Green Investing’s Mismatched Realities

The view is quite different, though, in the financial trenches, among practitioners who are raising capital and structuring deals. They worry about too much capital chasing too few green investments. “I’m still a true believer that the megatrends of decarbonization and digitalization will transform the way we live,” says Alex Leung, head of infrastructure research and strategy at UBS Asset Management. “But [these sectors] are getting to be crowded trades.”

How can both be true? The renewable energy universe is increasingly divided from a financial perspective. There is no shortage of capital, but much of it is concentrated in a few mature green technologies, while more-innovative or unproven sectors struggle to attract funding.

On one side are established, cost-effective technologies that investors can back with a reasonable expectation of a steady, decades-long payout. Solar and onshore wind power have moved into this category, as economies of scale and an equipment boom in China have driven the costs of these energy sources below fossil fuels.

On the other side are technologies that show promise but not yet profit, such as carbon capture or green hydrogen; or those with uncertain risks and high costs, like offshore wind. These projects still rely on deep-pocketed corporate backers or government support to reach commercial viability.

“Everyone wants to be part of the energy transition on paper,” says Antoine Saint Olive, global head of infrastructure and energy finance at Natixis Capital and Investment Banking in Paris. “But when you have a real deal on your desk, in many cases you are talking about new technologies.”

This mismatch—between an abundance of capital for well-established projects and an undersupply for higher-risk innovations—helps explain why trillions are still needed, even as investors complain of crowded trades.

Perhaps the most critical deals are in a border zone between proven and new technologies: in fast-developing storage systems for solar and wind power, and in adjustments to grids needed to transmit it. Renewable-generation investments will eventually hit a wall without upgraded delivery to the customer, and in some places they may have already.

As a rule of thumb, existing grids can cope until renewables reach 15% of their input, says Rebecca Fitz, a BCG partner and founding member of the firm’s Center for Energy Impact. Some parts of Europe are above 50%, creating “a bottleneck in power market design,” she says.

Europe’s patchwork of national grids and regulators poses special challenges to moving green energy from where it’s best produced—Spain and Portugal for solar, the Netherlands for wind—to where it’s needed, adds Stef Beusmans, an associate partner at Sustainable Capital Group in Amsterdam. “Different national support schemes make it harder for Europe to really fast-track deployment of clean energy,” he says.

Energy Transition Financing At A Crossroads

The enormous scope and complexity of the energy transition present both challenges and opportunities to the venerable, low-profile world of infrastructure finance, which absorbs about 4% of global capital, according to UBS. Plain vanilla deals are rare in this area. Bond underwriters and traders have rating agencies to guide them and liquid markets to distribute risk, but infrastructure investors must structure transactions individually and often hold the risk for the long haul. “Structuring and closing a deal could take up to a year,” Leung says. “Many infrastructure assets require active management after that. This isn’t just clipping a coupon.”

Green investments make the game only harder, says Marta Perez, head of the Americas infrastructure debt team at Allianz Capital Partners. “Traditional project finance models, which were designed around more-predictable long-term assets like fossil fuel power plants, need to evolve for the variable, often decentralized nature of renewable energy systems,” she explains.

Antoine Saint Olive, Natixis: Everyone wants to be part of the energy transition on paper.

Climate activists focus on a range of priorities: planting trees, insulating buildings, and more. For investors, however, the primary concern is electricity. BCG estimates that electric vehicles and other “end uses” of electricity account for 90% of the $18 trillion net-zero capital gap. “Electrified transport” and renewable-energy generation sucked up more than $600 billion each globally in 2023, according to Allianz. Power grid upgrades ran a distant third at $310 billion, and batteries and other energy-related components fourth at $135 billion.

The rush to build AI data centers—massive energy consumers—will drive those numbers only higher. UBS projects US electricity generation to grow by a staggering 20% annually from 2023-2026. The AI craze will be “slightly negative for decarbonization in the short term,” by demanding more power from fossil fuels, says Leung. However, AI also pulls the world’s biggest tech firms deeper into the energy transition. Despite recent fence-mending with Trump, Amazon, Alphabet (Google’s parent), Microsoft, and other hyperscalers that operate data centers remain “among the most committed to net-zero,” Leung says. “They may pay a premium for clean electricity.”

BCG’s Fitz points to a subtler trend: The AI-driven power surge is increasing the role of regulated utilities that can pass costs on through rate increases. That could provide one of the safest funding mechanisms for energy-transition investments. However, public resistance to higher bills—especially to fund Big Tech’s energy appetite—could become a major obstacle. BCG expects North American utilities to rely on renewables for 60% of the upcoming power demand increases, with natural gas supplying the other 35%.

One threat that infrastructure pros view as possibly overrated is Trump. The sheer duration of energy investments—far exceeding a single presidential term—makes policy swings less impactful. UBS research predicts that Trump will also struggle to repeal or gut the IRA. Roughly 70% of US renewable projects under development are in “red” states, which voted for Trump, Leung and his colleagues note. Eighteen Republicans in the House of Representatives already signed a letter opposing repeal, more than enough to be decisive in the narrowly divided chamber. But the impact of this resistance is hard to accurately measure, as Trump has been routinely bypassing Congress.

Texas, firmly in the Republican camp politically, nonetheless leads the US in wind and solar power. Nationwide, more than 70% of Americans support more wind and solar energy, according to Pew Research. UBS’ base-case scenario is that Trump will tweak the IRA rather than dismantle it, allowing Republican-led states to complete near-term renewable projects while still giving the president a political victory.

China Dominates Green Investing

The US, the world’s biggest economy, is not the leader in green investment. That distinction belongs to China, which last year sunk $818 billion into clean energy—more than the US, EU, and United Kingdom combined—according to CarbonCredits.com. Solar capacity in the People’s Republic jumped by 45.2% in 2024. China is also miles ahead in plans for nuclear power, which could be making a comeback in the US, too, if not Europe. Nuclear power emits no carbon, though it brings other well-known risks.

China’s leap forward in renewables is largely financed domestically, so global private capital looks elsewhere. Europe remains committed to a renewables surge to partly replace Russian natural gas imports, which Russian President Vladimir Putin cut off in response to Ukraine-related sanctions. The EU is also betting on more liquefied natural gas, but is still investing 10 times as much in renewables as in fossil fuels, the European Investment Bank (EIB) reports. The bloc’s total energy-transition investment jumped by one-third in 2023 to $360 billion and is expected to keep rising to meet 2030 carbon-reduction targets.

Other nations are also stepping up. India’s renewable capacity surged to nearly half the US level last year, with plans to triple by 2030. Six major solar developers in India have “successfully attracted investments from diverse sources, including foreign institutional investors from North America, Europe, and the Middle East,” S&P Global reports.

Brazil added a record 10.9 GW of power capacity last year, nearly 85% of it from renewables. Saudi Arabia is supporting the world’s largest and most ambitious green hydrogen project, near Neom, the kingdom’s “city of the future,” with $8.4 billion in promised investment, according to Neom. The goal is to split water molecules into their oxygen and hydrogen components using electric current produced from renewable sources, then store the hydrogen as a fuel source. Hot on their heels is the Saudis’ neighbor, the United Arab Emirates, leveraging its abundant sunshine for large-scale renewables projects.

Green Energy Has Plenty Of Investors

Capital for renewable energy is not drying up either. As populations age across the developed world and pension assets grow, managers look harder for investments that can match their long-term liabilities, Leung says. Funds in Australia and Canada, whose pension pools punch above their macroeconomic weight, are shifting up to 20% of their portfolios into infrastructure, he adds.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles continue to motivate big-ticket investors globally, Natixis’ Saint Olive points out. Banks, which provide at least as much infrastructure funding as institutional investors, still want to “greenify their balance sheets.” At least, banks outside the US do. “Banks and sponsors in the rest of the world still have ESG ambitions,” Saint Olive says. “That’s not going to collapse because there is a new president in one country.”

Private equity investments in green energy are also growing, from next to nothing before the pandemic to $26 billion globally by 2023, according to the EIB. Given the private equity model of leveraging up equity holdings, the money at work could be several times that figure.

Private equity players in the US are particularly focused on onshore wind generation, as solar becomes trendier and Texas officials push legislation that advantages fossil fuels, says BCG’s Fitz. “Private equity is paying a premium for wind assets,” she explains. “They view wind as a critical part of the energy picture going forward.”

Funding the global energy transition remains a monumental challenge. The US interstate highway system—one of the great infrastructure projects of the 20th century—cost $129 billion ($389 billion adjusted for inflation) when completed in 1991, according to the US Department of Transportation. That is a small slice of just one year’s capital needs for green power. The US highway system used proven technology and relied on the federal budget.

“Renewables require not just infrastructure, but also a complete rethinking of how energy is produced, stored, and distributed,” as Allianz’s Perez puts it. Governments, strained by 21st century social commitments, want to offload as much cost as possible to the private sector, China partially excepted.

Most renewable-transition estimates exclude the enormous investment required in mining the metals that will build batteries, grids, and turbines, Saint Olive notes. Mining is a “fully merchant business” too dependent on fluctuating prices to offer fixed, infrastructure-style returns; and it earns investors no green points for regulatory or public relations purposes, he adds. “Many banks don’t see the mining business positively from an ESG perspective,” he says. “They would rather let others finance it.”

Energy-Transition Train Is Already Moving

All the same, the global energy transition is not only continuing but accelerating, whatever the rhetoric coming from the White House. Infrastructure investors need to be part of the “complete rethinking” of a lower-carbon future. “The good-ol’ fully contracted project is getting harder to find,” Saint Olive observes.

But infrastructure investors are also used to designing bespoke solutions for a changing project landscape. “The beautiful part of our profession is that for the same asset you can have 20 different finance structures,” Saint Olive says. “In the US, you may have bank loans for construction, then turn to capital markets. European plants could rely on a 10-year power-purchase agreement. In the Middle East, you can get very long-term financing: construction plus 25 years.”

The critical question isn’t whether the transition will happen—but whether it will happen fast enough to avert ecological catastrophe. Private finance looks set to do its part, if engineers and governments can combine to deliver viable investments. “If projects are generating 20% returns, more capital will come in,” UBS’ Leung states. “Economic viability is a big part of the equation, but not always part of the discussion.”



Source link

2025 Proof American Platinum Eagle for Right to Petition


Another United States Mint series comes to a close with today’s noon ET release of the 2025 First Amendment to the United States Constitution Platinum Proof Coin – Right To Petition. Each is struck from 1 ounce of 99.95% fine platinum at the U.S. Mint’s West Point facility and carries a face value of $100.

2025-W Proof American Platinum Eagle - Obverse and Reverse
2025-W Proof American Platinum Eagle – Obverse and Reverse

This coin is the final issue in a five-coin series that began in 2021. The series highlights the five freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment: religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. It draws inspiration from the Amendment’s full text:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

To symbolize these freedoms, the series features designs illustrating the life cycle of an oak tree, from seedling to mature oak, representing the foundational role of the First Amendment in shaping the nation.

The now-completed series includes:

Recent sales figures for the series show 9,884 of the 2021 coin sold, 9,941 of the 2022, 8,494 of the 2023, and 5,106 of the 2024 coin.

All five obverse (heads side) designs in the series were created by Artistic Infusion Program (AIP) Designer Donna Weaver and sculpted by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Joseph Menna.

The 2025 Right to Petition Platinum Proof Coin features a mature oak tree along with inscriptions reading “WITH THE RIGHT TO PETITION LIBERTY ENDURES,” “E PLURIBUS UNUM,” “IN GOD WE TRUST,” and “2025.”

A common reverse (tails side) design appears on all five coins in the First Amendment series and was also used in the 2018-2020 Preamble to the Declaration of Independence Platinum Series. It depicts an eagle in flight clutching an olive branch, symbolizing peace. The design was created by AIP Designer Patricia Lucas-Morris and sculpted by Medallic Artist Don Everhart.

Reverse inscriptions include “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,” “$100,” “1 OZ.,” and “.9995 PLATINUM.” A “W” mintmark also appears, indicating production at the West Point Mint

Coin Specifications

Denomination: $100
Finish: Proof
Composition: 99.95% Platinum
Diameter: 1.287 inches
(32.70 mm)
Weight: 1.0005 troy oz.
(31.120 grams)
Edge: Reeded
Mint and Mint Mark: West Point – W

 

Previous Proof American Platinum Eagle Programs

Proof American Platinum Eagles first appeared in 1997 and have seen multiple theme and design changes, including:

  • Portrait of Liberty (1997)
  • Vistas of Liberty (1998 to 2002)
  • Foundations of Democracy (2006 to 2008)
  • Preamble to the Constitution (2009 to 2014)
  • Torches of Liberty (2015 and 2016)
  • a return to the Portrait of Liberty design in 2017 to mark the 20th anniversary of the program
  • Preamble to the Declaration of Independence Series (2018 to 2020)

Scheduled to launch in 2026 as part of the nation’s Semiquincentennial, the United States Mint will introduce the Charters of Freedom Platinum Proof Coin Series, concluding in 2028.

Ordering, Price, Mintage and Limits

2025 First Amendment to the United States Constitution Platinum Proof Coin — Right to Petition is available for order directly from the U.S. Mint’s catalog of platinum coins.

Pricing, now at $1,545, follows the Mint’s precious metal product pricing structure and may be adjusted weekly based on market fluctuations. The coin has a mintage limit of 9,000, with an initial household order limit of three.



Source link

Kroger Stock Drops as CEO McMullen Resigns Following Conduct Probe



KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Kroger shares are falling Monday morning after the grocery chain said that CEO and Chairman Rodney McMullen has resigned following a probe on his personal conduct.
  • McMullen is stepping down “following a Board investigation of his personal conduct that, while unrelated to the business, was inconsistent with Kroger’s Policy on Business Ethics,” the company said. 
  • Lead Director Ron Sargent was appointed board chair and interim CEO. 

Kroger (KR) shares are falling more than 1% Monday morning after the grocery chain said that CEO and Chairman Rodney McMullen has resigned after a probe on his personal conduct.

McMullen is stepping down “following a Board investigation of his personal conduct that, while unrelated to the business, was inconsistent with Kroger’s Policy on Business Ethics,” the company said. 

Kroger said it “was made aware of certain personal conduct by Mr. McMullen” on Feb. 21 “and immediately retained outside independent counsel to conduct an investigation.” Kroger also said McMullen’s conduct wasn’t related to its “financial performance, operations or reporting, and it did not involve any Kroger associates.” 

Kroger declined to comment further Monday.

Lead Director Ronald Sargent was appointed board chair and interim CEO, according to a news release.

McMullen joined Kroger in 1978 as a part-time stock clerk in Lexington, Kentucky, according to his biography on the Kroger website, and became CEO in 2014.

Several CEOs in recent years have lost their jobs for personal relationships or other issues that ran afoul of company policies. According to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, seven CEOs left due to allegations of misconduct in 2024 through October last year.

Shares of Kroger, which is scheduled to report earnings Thursday, are up about 30% in the past 12 months.



Source link

Copyright © 2023 | Powered by WordPress | Coin Market Theme by A WP Life